First, we define in this paper two benchmark flows readily usable by anyone calibrating a numerical tool for concrete flow prediction. Such benchmark flows shall allow anyone to check the validity of their computational tools no matter the numerical methods and parameters they choose. Second, we compare numerical predictions for these two benchmark flows obtained by various research teams around the world using various numerical techniques. Our results show that all numerical techniques compared here give very similar results suggesting that numerical simulations of concrete flow have reached a technology readiness level allowing them to move from the lab to the industrial practice.

Numerical simulations of concrete flow: A benchmark comparison

CREMONESI, MASSIMILIANO;FERRARA, LIBERATO;
2016-01-01

Abstract

First, we define in this paper two benchmark flows readily usable by anyone calibrating a numerical tool for concrete flow prediction. Such benchmark flows shall allow anyone to check the validity of their computational tools no matter the numerical methods and parameters they choose. Second, we compare numerical predictions for these two benchmark flows obtained by various research teams around the world using various numerical techniques. Our results show that all numerical techniques compared here give very similar results suggesting that numerical simulations of concrete flow have reached a technology readiness level allowing them to move from the lab to the industrial practice.
2016
casting; Fresh Concrete (A); Modeling (E); Rheology (A); Workability (A); Materials Science (all); Building and Construction
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CEMCON-S-15-00452.pdf

accesso aperto

: Pre-Print (o Pre-Refereeing)
Dimensione 1.3 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.3 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/974394
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 86
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 68
social impact