The recent tendency to reduce the weight of car bodies is posing a new challenge to vertical ride quality, since the vibrations related to car-body vertical bending modes affect heavily passengers’ comfort and cannot be fully mitigated by conventional vehicle suspensions. In this work, four mechatronic suspensions, considering active and semi-active technologies in secondary and primary suspensions, are compared to show their relative merits. LQG and H∞ model-based control strategies are established in a consistent way for each suspension scheme to perform a comparative assessment of the four concepts on objective grounds. A two-dimensional 9-DOF vehicle model is firstly built, using a simplified representation of car-body bending modes; this model is also used to design the model-based controllers. The comparison of the four mechatronic suspension schemes based on the 9-DOF model shows that full-active secondary suspension is the most effective solution whilst semi-active primary suspension is also effective in terms of mitigating car-body bending vibration. Then, a three-dimensional flexible multibody system (FMBS) vehicle model integrated with a finite-element car-body is considered to allow a more detailed consideration of the vehicle’s vibrating behaviour. The results of the FMBS model show a good agreement to the results of the 9-DOF model and the relative merits of the four mechatronic suspension schemes as found from the previous analysis are basically confirmed, although the FMBS model is more suited for a quantitative assessment of ride quality.

An examination of alternative schemes for active and semi-active control of vertical car-body vibration to improve ride comfort

Fu B.;Bruni S.
2022-01-01

Abstract

The recent tendency to reduce the weight of car bodies is posing a new challenge to vertical ride quality, since the vibrations related to car-body vertical bending modes affect heavily passengers’ comfort and cannot be fully mitigated by conventional vehicle suspensions. In this work, four mechatronic suspensions, considering active and semi-active technologies in secondary and primary suspensions, are compared to show their relative merits. LQG and H∞ model-based control strategies are established in a consistent way for each suspension scheme to perform a comparative assessment of the four concepts on objective grounds. A two-dimensional 9-DOF vehicle model is firstly built, using a simplified representation of car-body bending modes; this model is also used to design the model-based controllers. The comparison of the four mechatronic suspension schemes based on the 9-DOF model shows that full-active secondary suspension is the most effective solution whilst semi-active primary suspension is also effective in terms of mitigating car-body bending vibration. Then, a three-dimensional flexible multibody system (FMBS) vehicle model integrated with a finite-element car-body is considered to allow a more detailed consideration of the vehicle’s vibrating behaviour. The results of the FMBS model show a good agreement to the results of the 9-DOF model and the relative merits of the four mechatronic suspension schemes as found from the previous analysis are basically confirmed, although the FMBS model is more suited for a quantitative assessment of ride quality.
2022
Active suspension, flexible car-body, H∞ control, linear quadratic Gaussian control, ride comfort, semi-active primary suspension
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Vertical_ride_comfort_journal_paper_revised_draft_V0_SB_BF upload IRIS.pdf

accesso aperto

: Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione 2.16 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.16 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
fu-bruni-2021-an-examination-of-alternative-schemes-for-active-and-semi-active.pdf

accesso aperto

: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 3.27 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.27 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1212858
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact