"Two features characterize a good inspection system: it is accurate, and compared to the manufacturing cost, it is not expensive. Unfortunately, few measuring systems posses both these characteristics, i.e. low uncertainty comes with a cost. But also high uncertainty comes with a cost, because measuring systems with high uncertainty tend to generate more inspection errors, which come with a cost. In the case of geometric inspection, the geometric deviation is evaluated from a cloud of points sampled on a part. Therefore, not only the measuring device has to be selected, but also the sampling strategy has to be planned, i.e. the sampling point cloud size and where points should be located on the feature to inspect have to be decided. When the measuring device is already available, as it often happens in geometric measurement, where most instruments are flexible, an unwise strategy planning can be the largest uncertainty contributor. In this work, a model for the evaluation of the overall inspection cost is proposed. The optimization of the model can lead to an optimal inspection strategy in economic sense. However, the model itself is based on uncertainty evaluation, in order to assess the impact of measurement error on inspection cost. Therefore, two methodologies for evaluating the uncertainty will be proposed. These methodologies will be focused on the evaluation of the contribution of the sampling strategy to the uncertainty. Finally, few case studies dealing with the inspection planning for a Coordinate Measuring Machine will be proposed.

Optimal inspection strategy planning for geometric tolerance verification

MORONI, GIOVANNI;PETRO', STEFANO
2014-01-01

Abstract

"Two features characterize a good inspection system: it is accurate, and compared to the manufacturing cost, it is not expensive. Unfortunately, few measuring systems posses both these characteristics, i.e. low uncertainty comes with a cost. But also high uncertainty comes with a cost, because measuring systems with high uncertainty tend to generate more inspection errors, which come with a cost. In the case of geometric inspection, the geometric deviation is evaluated from a cloud of points sampled on a part. Therefore, not only the measuring device has to be selected, but also the sampling strategy has to be planned, i.e. the sampling point cloud size and where points should be located on the feature to inspect have to be decided. When the measuring device is already available, as it often happens in geometric measurement, where most instruments are flexible, an unwise strategy planning can be the largest uncertainty contributor. In this work, a model for the evaluation of the overall inspection cost is proposed. The optimization of the model can lead to an optimal inspection strategy in economic sense. However, the model itself is based on uncertainty evaluation, in order to assess the impact of measurement error on inspection cost. Therefore, two methodologies for evaluating the uncertainty will be proposed. These methodologies will be focused on the evaluation of the contribution of the sampling strategy to the uncertainty. Finally, few case studies dealing with the inspection planning for a Coordinate Measuring Machine will be proposed.
2014
Geometric deviation; Geometric inspection; Inspection cost model; Sampling strategy; Uncertainty;
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
0Optimal inspection strategy planning for geometric tolerance verification.pdf

Open Access dal 02/01/2017

Descrizione: Post-print
: Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione 2.92 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.92 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Optimal inspection strategy planning for geometric tolerance verification.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Paper definitivo
: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 1.35 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.35 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/968978
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 30
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact