In this paper the effectiveness has been assessed of an upgrading/retrofitting system for coupling beams (span-to-depth ratio equal to 1.5) not designed to resist earthquake actions. The proposed retrofitting technology employs either High Performance Fiber Rein-forced Cementitious Composites (HPFRCCs) or Textile Reinforced Cementitious Composites (TRCCs). 14 mock-ups of coupling beam units, scale 1:2, have been casted and subjected to either monotonic or cyclic loading tests. The experimental programme has been devised in such a way that in a first stage the different resisting mechanisms in conventional plain and reinforced concrete coupling beams have been first of all investigated (tensile strength of concrete in plain concrete coupling beam; strut-and-tie mechanisms in coupling beams reinforced with only longitudinal bars; enhancement of the aforementioned mechanism due to stirrups). The influence has been investigated, on the develop-ment of the above cited mechanisms, of the boundary conditions due to the shear wall shafts the coupling beam is spanning between. This is an important and so far not well clarified topic. Longitudinal and transverse reinforcement have been designed to comply only with EC2 minimum requirements for non seismic design situations. In a second stage the effectiveness of the upgrading/retrofitting techniques has been check-ed testing non- and pre-damaged coupling beams; in the latter case two different drift levels have been selected for pre-damage, namely 1% and 2%, respectively meant as representative of ductility demand for SLS and ULS. Results, analyzed in terms of maximum load bearing and drift capacity and dissipated energy highlight the effectiveness of the proposed upgrading/retrofitting techniques, which, also in view of their ease of execution and reduced invasiveness, can stand as a reliable alternative to other more commonly employed ones
Rinforzo strutturake di architravi mediante compositi cementizi fibrorinforzati ad elevate prestazioni
MUHAXHERI, MILOT;FERRARA, LIBERATO;DI PRISCO, MARCO
2014-01-01
Abstract
In this paper the effectiveness has been assessed of an upgrading/retrofitting system for coupling beams (span-to-depth ratio equal to 1.5) not designed to resist earthquake actions. The proposed retrofitting technology employs either High Performance Fiber Rein-forced Cementitious Composites (HPFRCCs) or Textile Reinforced Cementitious Composites (TRCCs). 14 mock-ups of coupling beam units, scale 1:2, have been casted and subjected to either monotonic or cyclic loading tests. The experimental programme has been devised in such a way that in a first stage the different resisting mechanisms in conventional plain and reinforced concrete coupling beams have been first of all investigated (tensile strength of concrete in plain concrete coupling beam; strut-and-tie mechanisms in coupling beams reinforced with only longitudinal bars; enhancement of the aforementioned mechanism due to stirrups). The influence has been investigated, on the develop-ment of the above cited mechanisms, of the boundary conditions due to the shear wall shafts the coupling beam is spanning between. This is an important and so far not well clarified topic. Longitudinal and transverse reinforcement have been designed to comply only with EC2 minimum requirements for non seismic design situations. In a second stage the effectiveness of the upgrading/retrofitting techniques has been check-ed testing non- and pre-damaged coupling beams; in the latter case two different drift levels have been selected for pre-damage, namely 1% and 2%, respectively meant as representative of ductility demand for SLS and ULS. Results, analyzed in terms of maximum load bearing and drift capacity and dissipated energy highlight the effectiveness of the proposed upgrading/retrofitting techniques, which, also in view of their ease of execution and reduced invasiveness, can stand as a reliable alternative to other more commonly employed onesFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
CTE Muhaxheri et al rinforzo architravi.doc
Accesso riservato
:
Pre-Print (o Pre-Refereeing)
Dimensione
8.18 MB
Formato
Microsoft Word
|
8.18 MB | Microsoft Word | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.