Despite the growing popularity of Design Thinking (DT) as a catalyst for organisational innovation, agility, and user-centred transformation, its actual adoption often remains superficial, fragmented, or symbolic. This study presents a systematic literature review of 64 peer-reviewed publications, aiming to identify, categorise, and interpret the key barriers to DT implementation in organisational contexts. Findings reveal that resistance to DT is rooted not merely in technical or procedural limitations, but in deeper organisational structures, cultures, and mental models. Through thematic synthesis, four recurring macro-barriers are identified: (1) uncertainty induced by change, (2) leadership-related constraints, (3) incompatibility of approaches and languages, and (4) trivialisation of the method. The study contributes a structured and updated categorisation of these barriers, highlighting the need for long-term, systemic efforts—such as cultivating design-literate leadership, strengthening internal capabilities, fostering cross-disciplinary communication, and embedding a tolerance for ambiguity. By analysing the interrelations among these barriers, the paper sheds light on why DT initiatives often fall short of expectations and offers actionable insights for organisations seeking to integrate DT more meaningfully into their culture and operations. Moreover, it provides actionable insights to organisations and decision-makers seeking to integrate DT into their strategic and operational models. Ultimately, DT is presented not as a shortcut to innovation, but as an organisational mindset—one that requires clarity, resilience, and a sustained commitment to learning through uncertainty.

Design Thinking beyond the hype: organisational barriers and implementation challenges

Carella, Gianluca;Cautela, Cabirio;Melazzini, Michele;Zurlo, Francesco
2025-01-01

Abstract

Despite the growing popularity of Design Thinking (DT) as a catalyst for organisational innovation, agility, and user-centred transformation, its actual adoption often remains superficial, fragmented, or symbolic. This study presents a systematic literature review of 64 peer-reviewed publications, aiming to identify, categorise, and interpret the key barriers to DT implementation in organisational contexts. Findings reveal that resistance to DT is rooted not merely in technical or procedural limitations, but in deeper organisational structures, cultures, and mental models. Through thematic synthesis, four recurring macro-barriers are identified: (1) uncertainty induced by change, (2) leadership-related constraints, (3) incompatibility of approaches and languages, and (4) trivialisation of the method. The study contributes a structured and updated categorisation of these barriers, highlighting the need for long-term, systemic efforts—such as cultivating design-literate leadership, strengthening internal capabilities, fostering cross-disciplinary communication, and embedding a tolerance for ambiguity. By analysing the interrelations among these barriers, the paper sheds light on why DT initiatives often fall short of expectations and offers actionable insights for organisations seeking to integrate DT more meaningfully into their culture and operations. Moreover, it provides actionable insights to organisations and decision-makers seeking to integrate DT into their strategic and operational models. Ultimately, DT is presented not as a shortcut to innovation, but as an organisational mindset—one that requires clarity, resilience, and a sustained commitment to learning through uncertainty.
2025
IASDR 2025: Design Next
978-1-912294-64-0
Design Thinking, Design Thinking adoption, barriers for adoption, organisational change
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Estratto_DT_Proceedings of IASDR2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: articolo
: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 841.68 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
841.68 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1310647
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact