We investigate the problem of failure localization in disaggregated optical networks and multi-operator environments, where end-to-end management requires coordination and data sharing between operators. We leverage Vertical Federated Learning (VFL) to enable collaborative failure localization while minimizing exposure of risk-sensitive data. We propose two VFL solutions, a neural network-based solution (SplitNN) and a gradient-boosted tree-based solution (GBDT-VFL), addressing collaborative and privacy-preserving failure localization using homogeneous and heterogeneous types of data in multi-operator and disaggregated multi-vendor scenarios, respectively, and test them on two independent optical network datasets. Our experimental results show that the proposed approaches provide comparable Accuracy in failure localization (differences are within 3%) compared to baseline scenarios of centralized failure management in which a global model is used to perform failure localization.
Failure Localization in Disaggregated Optical Networks: Application of Vertical Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Data
Ibrahimi, Mëmëdhe;Temiz, Fatih;Musumeci, Francesco;Sticca, Giovanni;Tornatore, Massimo
2025-01-01
Abstract
We investigate the problem of failure localization in disaggregated optical networks and multi-operator environments, where end-to-end management requires coordination and data sharing between operators. We leverage Vertical Federated Learning (VFL) to enable collaborative failure localization while minimizing exposure of risk-sensitive data. We propose two VFL solutions, a neural network-based solution (SplitNN) and a gradient-boosted tree-based solution (GBDT-VFL), addressing collaborative and privacy-preserving failure localization using homogeneous and heterogeneous types of data in multi-operator and disaggregated multi-vendor scenarios, respectively, and test them on two independent optical network datasets. Our experimental results show that the proposed approaches provide comparable Accuracy in failure localization (differences are within 3%) compared to baseline scenarios of centralized failure management in which a global model is used to perform failure localization.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
pre_print_ICMLCN_Ibrahimi.pdf
accesso aperto
:
Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione
431.54 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
431.54 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


