Background: Introducing variability in tidal volume, ventilatory frequency, or both is beneficial during mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We investigated whether applying cycle-by-cycle variability in the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) exerts beneficial effect on lung function in a model of ARDS. Methods: Rabbits with lung injury were randomly allocated to receive mechanical ventilation for 6 h by applying a pressure-controlled mode with constant PEEP of 7 cm H2O (PC group: n=6) or variable PEEP (VEEP) with a coefficient of variation of 21.4%, range 4–10 cm H2O (PC-VEEP group; n=6). Lung oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) after 6 h of ventilation (H6) was the primary outcome and respiratory mechanics, lung volume, intrapulmonary shunt, and lung inflammatory markers were secondary outcomes. Results: After lung injury, both groups presented moderate-to-severe ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 <27 kPa). The PaO2/FiO2 was significantly higher in the PC-VEEP group than in the PC group at H6 (12.3 [SD 3.5] vs 19.2 [7.2] kPa, P=0.013) and a lower arterial partial pressure of CO2 at 1–3 h (P<0.02). The ventilation-induced increases in airway resistance and tissue elastance were prevented by PC-VEEP. There was no evidence for a difference in minute volume, driving pressure, end-tidal CO2, lung volumes, intrapulmonary shunt fraction, and cytokines between the ventilation modes. Conclusions: Prolonged mechanical ventilation with cycle-by-cycle VEEP prevents deterioration in gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in a model of ARDS, suggesting the benefit of this novel ventilation strategy to optimise gas exchange without increasing driving pressure and lung overdistension.

Variable positive end-expiratory pressure in an experimental model of acute respiratory distress syndrome: an advanced ventilation modality

Bizzotto D.;Dellaca' R.;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Background: Introducing variability in tidal volume, ventilatory frequency, or both is beneficial during mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We investigated whether applying cycle-by-cycle variability in the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) exerts beneficial effect on lung function in a model of ARDS. Methods: Rabbits with lung injury were randomly allocated to receive mechanical ventilation for 6 h by applying a pressure-controlled mode with constant PEEP of 7 cm H2O (PC group: n=6) or variable PEEP (VEEP) with a coefficient of variation of 21.4%, range 4–10 cm H2O (PC-VEEP group; n=6). Lung oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) after 6 h of ventilation (H6) was the primary outcome and respiratory mechanics, lung volume, intrapulmonary shunt, and lung inflammatory markers were secondary outcomes. Results: After lung injury, both groups presented moderate-to-severe ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 <27 kPa). The PaO2/FiO2 was significantly higher in the PC-VEEP group than in the PC group at H6 (12.3 [SD 3.5] vs 19.2 [7.2] kPa, P=0.013) and a lower arterial partial pressure of CO2 at 1–3 h (P<0.02). The ventilation-induced increases in airway resistance and tissue elastance were prevented by PC-VEEP. There was no evidence for a difference in minute volume, driving pressure, end-tidal CO2, lung volumes, intrapulmonary shunt fraction, and cytokines between the ventilation modes. Conclusions: Prolonged mechanical ventilation with cycle-by-cycle VEEP prevents deterioration in gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in a model of ARDS, suggesting the benefit of this novel ventilation strategy to optimise gas exchange without increasing driving pressure and lung overdistension.
2024
gas exchange
lung function
lung oxygenation index
variable ventilation
ventilator-induced lung injury
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1273324
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact