Jacques Heyman’s 1966 article “The Stone Skeleton” has been influential in the assessment of ma-sonry arches in general, including masonry bridges and gothic architecture. Heyman’s article relies on limiting assumptions about arch behavior, and concludes that an arch can be declared stable based on the location of a statically admissible thrust line within the arch. In the following com-mentary, we assess the validity of the assumptions made by Heyman and the uses that have been made of his application of the lower bound theorem of plasticity. We conclude that Heyman’s methods have enduring value, but that the user needs to recognize the limitations of the assump-tions made and the limits on the validity of conclusions imposed by these assumptions
The Stone Skeleton: A Reappraisal
D. Coronelli
2024-01-01
Abstract
Jacques Heyman’s 1966 article “The Stone Skeleton” has been influential in the assessment of ma-sonry arches in general, including masonry bridges and gothic architecture. Heyman’s article relies on limiting assumptions about arch behavior, and concludes that an arch can be declared stable based on the location of a statically admissible thrust line within the arch. In the following com-mentary, we assess the validity of the assumptions made by Heyman and the uses that have been made of his application of the lower bound theorem of plasticity. We conclude that Heyman’s methods have enduring value, but that the user needs to recognize the limitations of the assump-tions made and the limits on the validity of conclusions imposed by these assumptionsFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
heritage-07-00107-v2.pdf
accesso aperto
:
Publisher’s version
Dimensione
7.22 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
7.22 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.