The QUESTION OF ALTERITY has become fundamental to understanding contemporary societies, which are increasingly multicultural, multiethnic and intersectional. That which is OTHER poses questions that one is not used to answering, poses itself as a term of contradiction, questioning established certainties and beliefs. Alterity is a field yet to be explored, especially when one wants to move from theoretical reflection, inevitable and necessary, to transformative praxis. Reflection on alterity leads to the ABANDONMENT OF ALL FORMS OF CENTRALISM. Acceptance of a culture based on the recognition of alterity and mutual responsibility requires overcoming anthropocentrism and androcentrism, but also Eurocentrism and logocentrism, that is, the domination of some forms of communication and signification over all others. Today, it is legitimate to think that the design dimension can also undertake research paths that highlight THE NEED TO RECOGNISE THE OTHER: from migratory flows to gender cultures, from social fragility to mental health, from cultural distances to the difficulties of social integration, etc. This is the direction in which the essays in this volume are heading. Design culture has the right tools to promote innovative and open visions of relations between people, peoples, and languages.
Designing with the Other. Collaboration and Plurality as a Growth Potential for Designers
F. Mattioli;S. D. Ferraris
2024-01-01
Abstract
The QUESTION OF ALTERITY has become fundamental to understanding contemporary societies, which are increasingly multicultural, multiethnic and intersectional. That which is OTHER poses questions that one is not used to answering, poses itself as a term of contradiction, questioning established certainties and beliefs. Alterity is a field yet to be explored, especially when one wants to move from theoretical reflection, inevitable and necessary, to transformative praxis. Reflection on alterity leads to the ABANDONMENT OF ALL FORMS OF CENTRALISM. Acceptance of a culture based on the recognition of alterity and mutual responsibility requires overcoming anthropocentrism and androcentrism, but also Eurocentrism and logocentrism, that is, the domination of some forms of communication and signification over all others. Today, it is legitimate to think that the design dimension can also undertake research paths that highlight THE NEED TO RECOGNISE THE OTHER: from migratory flows to gender cultures, from social fragility to mental health, from cultural distances to the difficulties of social integration, etc. This is the direction in which the essays in this volume are heading. Design culture has the right tools to promote innovative and open visions of relations between people, peoples, and languages.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
202403_FM-SF_Design With the Other.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: PDF con articolo, colophon e cover
:
Publisher’s version
Dimensione
3.1 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.1 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.