The uncertainty of climate change, the fast -growing increase of global (urban) population and, as a result, an intensified competition among urban land uses demand a transition towards spatial planning models that maximise resilience, sustainability, and land-efficiency of cities. To succeed on this transition, more rigorous, holistic, and flexible assessment approaches of Green Infrastructure (GI) are needed: i) to define better their economic costs, benefits (i.e. ecosystem services), and losses (i.e. ecosystem disservices); ii) to facilitate comparability between options (including grey alternatives); iii) to adapt their valuation to different context, socio-economic scenarios, and implementation models; iv) and to easily inform stakeholders and decision makers. To this end, we introduce a flexible multi-scale system dynamics modelling framework that can assess the socio - economic impact of urban GI (its ecosystem services and disservices) in a monetary and well-being value scale. For the monetary value scale, data from life cycle inventories, input -output models, and other process-based parameters of the system dynamics modules are translated to impact scores. This is done by calculating the marginal product of ecosystem services in both an economic production and a welfare function as an estimation of the s hadow prices of each service. The practicality of this framework to support urban planning decisions will be outlined through a methodological advancement’s roadmap, framed in the context of a current international project on re-naturing cities (Nature4Cities). Additionally, examples of previous cities and neighbourhood proposals will be used to show how our modelling approach could better inform future urban planning works.

A flexible multi-scale system dynamics modelling framework to assess the socio-economic impact of urban Green Infrastructure

J. Babi Almenar;
2017-01-01

Abstract

The uncertainty of climate change, the fast -growing increase of global (urban) population and, as a result, an intensified competition among urban land uses demand a transition towards spatial planning models that maximise resilience, sustainability, and land-efficiency of cities. To succeed on this transition, more rigorous, holistic, and flexible assessment approaches of Green Infrastructure (GI) are needed: i) to define better their economic costs, benefits (i.e. ecosystem services), and losses (i.e. ecosystem disservices); ii) to facilitate comparability between options (including grey alternatives); iii) to adapt their valuation to different context, socio-economic scenarios, and implementation models; iv) and to easily inform stakeholders and decision makers. To this end, we introduce a flexible multi-scale system dynamics modelling framework that can assess the socio - economic impact of urban GI (its ecosystem services and disservices) in a monetary and well-being value scale. For the monetary value scale, data from life cycle inventories, input -output models, and other process-based parameters of the system dynamics modules are translated to impact scores. This is done by calculating the marginal product of ecosystem services in both an economic production and a welfare function as an estimation of the s hadow prices of each service. The practicality of this framework to support urban planning decisions will be outlined through a methodological advancement’s roadmap, framed in the context of a current international project on re-naturing cities (Nature4Cities). Additionally, examples of previous cities and neighbourhood proposals will be used to show how our modelling approach could better inform future urban planning works.
2017
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
book_of_abstract.pdf

accesso aperto

: Altro materiale allegato
Dimensione 3.57 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.57 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1259396
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact