A two-step strategy for the mechanical analysis of unreinforced masonry (URM) structures, subjected to either in-or out-of-plane loading, is presented. At a first step, a semi-automatic digital tool allows the parametric modeling of the structure that, together with an upper bound limit analysis tool and a heuristic optimization solver, enables tracking the most prone failure mechanism. At a second step, a coupled concurrent FE model with micro-and macroscales is assumed. A micromodeling description of the masonry is allocated to regions within the failure mechanism found in the former step. In converse, the other domain regions are modeled via a macroscale approach, whose constitutive response is elastic and orthotropic and formulated through closed-form homogenized-based solutions. The application of the framework is based on nonlinear static (pushover) analysis and conducted on three benchmarks: (i) an in-plane loaded URM shear wall; (ii) a U-shaped URM structure; and (iii) a URM church. Results are given in terms of load capacity curves, total displacement fields, and computational running time; and compared against those found with an FE microscopic model and with a limit analysis tool. Lastly, conclusions on the potential of the framework and future research streams are addressed.
A concurrent micro/macro FE-model optimized with a limit analysis tool for the assessment of dry-joint masonry structures
Luis C. Silva;
2022-01-01
Abstract
A two-step strategy for the mechanical analysis of unreinforced masonry (URM) structures, subjected to either in-or out-of-plane loading, is presented. At a first step, a semi-automatic digital tool allows the parametric modeling of the structure that, together with an upper bound limit analysis tool and a heuristic optimization solver, enables tracking the most prone failure mechanism. At a second step, a coupled concurrent FE model with micro-and macroscales is assumed. A micromodeling description of the masonry is allocated to regions within the failure mechanism found in the former step. In converse, the other domain regions are modeled via a macroscale approach, whose constitutive response is elastic and orthotropic and formulated through closed-form homogenized-based solutions. The application of the framework is based on nonlinear static (pushover) analysis and conducted on three benchmarks: (i) an in-plane loaded URM shear wall; (ii) a U-shaped URM structure; and (iii) a URM church. Results are given in terms of load capacity curves, total displacement fields, and computational running time; and compared against those found with an FE microscopic model and with a limit analysis tool. Lastly, conclusions on the potential of the framework and future research streams are addressed.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Manuscript_IJMCE_RGate_IRIS.pdf
accesso aperto
:
Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione
1.42 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.42 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


