Droop control, inertia control, and PD control are three typical frequency response (FR) strategies of grid-tied inverters interfaced renewable energy sources (RES) to restrain the power system frequency indicators, i.e., frequency deviation ( Δ ω) and the rate of change of frequency (RoCoF). Due to the highly limited inverter capacity, the FR performance in power systems with high RES penetration should be optimized. To this end, this paper first analyzes the impact of high-penetration renewable energy injection on power system frequency stability, and derives the system frequency expressions in the absence of an FR scheme, and in the presence of droop/inertia/PD controls that are representative for various virtual synchronous generator-based FR schemes. Under the same constraint of available FR capacity, control parameter ranges of these FR schemes are obtained, and their optimal conditions for restraining the maxima of Δ ω and RoCoF are identified and compared analytically. Comparison conclusions are finally proved by the provided experiment and simulation results.

Performance Comparison of Typical Frequency Response Strategies for Power Systems With High Penetration of Renewable Energy Sources

Liu X.;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Droop control, inertia control, and PD control are three typical frequency response (FR) strategies of grid-tied inverters interfaced renewable energy sources (RES) to restrain the power system frequency indicators, i.e., frequency deviation ( Δ ω) and the rate of change of frequency (RoCoF). Due to the highly limited inverter capacity, the FR performance in power systems with high RES penetration should be optimized. To this end, this paper first analyzes the impact of high-penetration renewable energy injection on power system frequency stability, and derives the system frequency expressions in the absence of an FR scheme, and in the presence of droop/inertia/PD controls that are representative for various virtual synchronous generator-based FR schemes. Under the same constraint of available FR capacity, control parameter ranges of these FR schemes are obtained, and their optimal conditions for restraining the maxima of Δ ω and RoCoF are identified and compared analytically. Comparison conclusions are finally proved by the provided experiment and simulation results.
2022
ELETTRICI
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Performance_Comparison_of_Typical_Frequency_Response_Strategies_for_Power_Systems_With_High_Penetration_of_Renewable_Energy_Sources.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Articolo principale
: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 1.7 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.7 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
JETCAS_Xiong_FR_Comparison.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
: Pre-Print (o Pre-Refereeing)
Dimensione 1.13 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.13 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1216778
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 35
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact