Enabling Dedicated Path Protection (DPP) in Filterless Optical Networks (FONs) poses specific design challenges, as FONs require dividing the network topology in non-overlapping fiber trees, and lightpaths cannot cross from one tree to another unless additional devices are installed. In this study, we consider the possibility to deploy three type of devices, namely InterTree Transceivers (ITTs), Wavelength Blockers (WBs) and Colored Passive Filters (CPFs) to achieve DPP in FON, and we compare the three resulting DPP strategies, called P-ITT, P-WB and P-WBC. More specifically, we formulate three Integer Linear Programming (ILP) models for DPP in FON with the objective to minimize additional device cost and minimize total wavelength consumption. Numerical results over two realistic topologies show that P-WBC achieves cost savings up to 33% in comparison to P-WB and up to 97% in comparison to P-ITT. However, even if it is the costliest approach, P-ITT ensures up to 7% savings in wavelength consumption and up to 23% savings in resource overbuild compared to P-WB and P-WBC, making it a possible candidate in spectrum-scarce deployments.
Strategies for Dedicated Path Protection in Filterless Optical Networks
Memedhe Ibrahimi;Omran Ayoub;Francesco Musumeci;Massimo Tornatore
2021-01-01
Abstract
Enabling Dedicated Path Protection (DPP) in Filterless Optical Networks (FONs) poses specific design challenges, as FONs require dividing the network topology in non-overlapping fiber trees, and lightpaths cannot cross from one tree to another unless additional devices are installed. In this study, we consider the possibility to deploy three type of devices, namely InterTree Transceivers (ITTs), Wavelength Blockers (WBs) and Colored Passive Filters (CPFs) to achieve DPP in FON, and we compare the three resulting DPP strategies, called P-ITT, P-WB and P-WBC. More specifically, we formulate three Integer Linear Programming (ILP) models for DPP in FON with the objective to minimize additional device cost and minimize total wavelength consumption. Numerical results over two realistic topologies show that P-WBC achieves cost savings up to 33% in comparison to P-WB and up to 97% in comparison to P-ITT. However, even if it is the costliest approach, P-ITT ensures up to 7% savings in wavelength consumption and up to 23% savings in resource overbuild compared to P-WB and P-WBC, making it a possible candidate in spectrum-scarce deployments.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Globecom21_DPP_cameraReady.pdf
accesso aperto
:
Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione
603.88 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
603.88 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.