Purpose: Grounding on resource orchestration theory, this paper aims to study the relationship between the way buying companies use their supplier performance measurement systems and the performance improvements obtained from suppliers, with relationship trust identified as a mediator in the previous link. Design/methodology/approach: The authors design a conceptual model and test it through structural equation modelling on a final sample of 147 buyer-supplier responses, collected by means of a dyadic survey. Findings: Results suggest that the buyer company may achieve the most by balancing a diagnostic and interactive use of the measurement system, as they are both positively related to supplier performance improvement. Furthermore, relationship trust acts as a mediator in case of the interactive use, but not for the diagnostic. This type of use negatively affects relationship trust, due to its mechanistic use in the buyer-supplier relationship. Originality/value: The authors’ results contribute to the current academic debate about supplier performance measurement system design and use by analyzing the impact of different supplier performance measurement system uses, and highlighting their relative impact on relationship trust and supplier performance improvement. From a methodological perspective, adopting a dyadic data collection process increases the robustness of the findings.

Supplier performance measurement system use, relationship trust, and performance improvement: a dyadic perspective

Caniato F.;Maccarrone P.
2021

Abstract

Purpose: Grounding on resource orchestration theory, this paper aims to study the relationship between the way buying companies use their supplier performance measurement systems and the performance improvements obtained from suppliers, with relationship trust identified as a mediator in the previous link. Design/methodology/approach: The authors design a conceptual model and test it through structural equation modelling on a final sample of 147 buyer-supplier responses, collected by means of a dyadic survey. Findings: Results suggest that the buyer company may achieve the most by balancing a diagnostic and interactive use of the measurement system, as they are both positively related to supplier performance improvement. Furthermore, relationship trust acts as a mediator in case of the interactive use, but not for the diagnostic. This type of use negatively affects relationship trust, due to its mechanistic use in the buyer-supplier relationship. Originality/value: The authors’ results contribute to the current academic debate about supplier performance measurement system design and use by analyzing the impact of different supplier performance measurement system uses, and highlighting their relative impact on relationship trust and supplier performance improvement. From a methodological perspective, adopting a dyadic data collection process increases the robustness of the findings.
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
Dyad
Performance
Supplier performance measurement system
Survey
Trust
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10-1108_IJLM-08-2020-0339.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Article - published version
: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 232.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
232.04 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Maestrini et al. IJLM 2021 post print.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Article post print
: Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione 424.6 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
424.6 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11311/1200526
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact