Many studies form the early 70s have determined the possibility, through the use of vibrations, to analyze the response of a human tibia in order to study its dynamic behavior under different excitation conditions and for different purposes. Comparative studies between contact and non-contact techniques have been carried out over the years, but in the case of non-uniform structures in form and materials, such as a human tibia, there is a lack of information. The aim of this paper is to dynamically characterize a human tibia replica,with the same mechanical and morphological proprieties, with and without an external fixation system highlighting limits and advantages of contact and non-contact approaches. This work proposes a comparison, in terms of FRFs and modal parameters, between the tibia alone and in the presence of an external fixation system, moreover the experimental data are compared also with a numerical model of such structures. Tests have been carried out using a mono-axial accelerometer for the contact measurement approaches and a laser Doppler vibrometer (632nm wavelength) for the non-contact one. The tibia has been placed on a foam support in order to simulate free-free conditions. The input was supplied both by a shaker and by a micro-hammer, keeping the same excitation direction. Results show that shaker-based excitation and micro-hammer excitation method can cause issues on the response measured with lasers. Modal analysis results tend to smooth these issues, even though laser-based data tend to senses a vertical in-plane in correspondence of the third horizontal mode because multiple components are sensed simultaneously during the scan.

Experimental and Numerical dynamic characterization of a human tibia

Chiariotti, Paolo;Martarelli, Milena;Scalise, Lorenzo
2018-01-01

Abstract

Many studies form the early 70s have determined the possibility, through the use of vibrations, to analyze the response of a human tibia in order to study its dynamic behavior under different excitation conditions and for different purposes. Comparative studies between contact and non-contact techniques have been carried out over the years, but in the case of non-uniform structures in form and materials, such as a human tibia, there is a lack of information. The aim of this paper is to dynamically characterize a human tibia replica,with the same mechanical and morphological proprieties, with and without an external fixation system highlighting limits and advantages of contact and non-contact approaches. This work proposes a comparison, in terms of FRFs and modal parameters, between the tibia alone and in the presence of an external fixation system, moreover the experimental data are compared also with a numerical model of such structures. Tests have been carried out using a mono-axial accelerometer for the contact measurement approaches and a laser Doppler vibrometer (632nm wavelength) for the non-contact one. The tibia has been placed on a foam support in order to simulate free-free conditions. The input was supplied both by a shaker and by a micro-hammer, keeping the same excitation direction. Results show that shaker-based excitation and micro-hammer excitation method can cause issues on the response measured with lasers. Modal analysis results tend to smooth these issues, even though laser-based data tend to senses a vertical in-plane in correspondence of the third horizontal mode because multiple components are sensed simultaneously during the scan.
2018
Vibration measurements
Laser Doppler vibrometry
Structural dynamics
Tibia dynamics
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Verdenelli_2018_J._Phys.__Conf._Ser._1149_012029.pdf

accesso aperto

: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 5.59 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.59 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1164259
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact