Closing volume (CV) is commonly measured by single-breath nitrogen washout (CVSBW). A method based on the forced oscillation technique was recently introduced to detect a surrogate CV (CVFOT). As the two approaches are based on different physiological mechanisms, we aim to investigate CVFOT and CVSBW relationship at different degrees and patterns of airway obstruction. A mathematical model was developed to evaluate the CVSBW and CVFOT sensitivity to different patterns of airway obstruction, either located in a specific lung region or equally distributed throughout the lung. The two CVs were also assessed during slow vital capacity (VC) maneuvers in triplicate in 13 healthy subjects and pre and post-methacholine challenge (Mch) in 12 mild-moderate asthmatics. Model simulations suggest that CVSBW is more sensitive than CVFOT to the presence of few flow-limited or closed airways that modify the contribution of tracer-poor and tracer-rich lung regions to the overall exhaled gas. Conversely, CVFOT occurs only when at least ~65% of lung units are flow-limited or closed, regardless of their regional distribution. CVSBW did not differ between healthy subjects and asthmatics (17±9%VC vs 22±10%VC) while CVFOT did (16±5%VC vs 23±6%VC, p<0.01). In asthmatics, both CVSBW and CVFOT increased post-Mch (33±7%VC p<0.001 and 43±12%VC p<0.001, respectively). CVSBW weakly correlated with CVFOT (r=0.45, p<0.01). The closing capacities (CV+residual volume) were correlated (r=0.74, p<0.001) but the changes with Mch in both CVs and closing capacities did not correlate. CVFOT is easy to measure and provides a reproducible parameter useful for describing airway impairment in obstructive respiratory diseases.
Closing volume detection by single breath gas washout and forced oscillation technique
Veneroni, Chiara;Dellaca', Raffaele
2021-01-01
Abstract
Closing volume (CV) is commonly measured by single-breath nitrogen washout (CVSBW). A method based on the forced oscillation technique was recently introduced to detect a surrogate CV (CVFOT). As the two approaches are based on different physiological mechanisms, we aim to investigate CVFOT and CVSBW relationship at different degrees and patterns of airway obstruction. A mathematical model was developed to evaluate the CVSBW and CVFOT sensitivity to different patterns of airway obstruction, either located in a specific lung region or equally distributed throughout the lung. The two CVs were also assessed during slow vital capacity (VC) maneuvers in triplicate in 13 healthy subjects and pre and post-methacholine challenge (Mch) in 12 mild-moderate asthmatics. Model simulations suggest that CVSBW is more sensitive than CVFOT to the presence of few flow-limited or closed airways that modify the contribution of tracer-poor and tracer-rich lung regions to the overall exhaled gas. Conversely, CVFOT occurs only when at least ~65% of lung units are flow-limited or closed, regardless of their regional distribution. CVSBW did not differ between healthy subjects and asthmatics (17±9%VC vs 22±10%VC) while CVFOT did (16±5%VC vs 23±6%VC, p<0.01). In asthmatics, both CVSBW and CVFOT increased post-Mch (33±7%VC p<0.001 and 43±12%VC p<0.001, respectively). CVSBW weakly correlated with CVFOT (r=0.45, p<0.01). The closing capacities (CV+residual volume) were correlated (r=0.74, p<0.001) but the changes with Mch in both CVs and closing capacities did not correlate. CVFOT is easy to measure and provides a reproducible parameter useful for describing airway impairment in obstructive respiratory diseases.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
