We propose a set of new indices to assist global sensitivity analysis in the presence of data allowing for interpretations based on a collection of diverse models whose parameters could be affected by uncertainty. Our global sensitivity analysis metrics enable us to assess the sensitivity of various features (as rendered through statistical moments) of the probability density function of a quantity of interest with respect to imperfect knowledge of (i) the interpretive model employed to characterize the system behavior and (ii) the ensuing model parameters. We exemplify our methodology for the case of heavy metal sorption onto soil, for which we consider three broadly used (equilibrium isotherm) models. Our analyses consider (a) an unconstrained case, i.e., when no data are available to constrain parameter uncertainty and to evaluate the (relative) plausibility of each considered model, and (b) a constrained case, i.e., when the analysis is constrained against experimental observations. Our moment-based indices are structured according to two key components: (a) a model-choice contribution, associated with the possibility of analyzing the system of interest by taking advantage of multiple model conceptualizations (or mathematical renderings); and (b) a parameter-choice contribution, related to the uncertainty in the parameters of a selected model. Our results indicate that a given parameter can be associated with diverse degrees of importance, depending on the considered statistical moment of the target model output. The influence on the latter of parameter and model uncertainty evolves as a function of the available level of information about the modeled system behavior.

Global Sensitivity Analysis for Multiple Interpretive Models With Uncertain Parameters

Dell'Oca A.;Riva M.;Guadagnini A.
2020-01-01

Abstract

We propose a set of new indices to assist global sensitivity analysis in the presence of data allowing for interpretations based on a collection of diverse models whose parameters could be affected by uncertainty. Our global sensitivity analysis metrics enable us to assess the sensitivity of various features (as rendered through statistical moments) of the probability density function of a quantity of interest with respect to imperfect knowledge of (i) the interpretive model employed to characterize the system behavior and (ii) the ensuing model parameters. We exemplify our methodology for the case of heavy metal sorption onto soil, for which we consider three broadly used (equilibrium isotherm) models. Our analyses consider (a) an unconstrained case, i.e., when no data are available to constrain parameter uncertainty and to evaluate the (relative) plausibility of each considered model, and (b) a constrained case, i.e., when the analysis is constrained against experimental observations. Our moment-based indices are structured according to two key components: (a) a model-choice contribution, associated with the possibility of analyzing the system of interest by taking advantage of multiple model conceptualizations (or mathematical renderings); and (b) a parameter-choice contribution, related to the uncertainty in the parameters of a selected model. Our results indicate that a given parameter can be associated with diverse degrees of importance, depending on the considered statistical moment of the target model output. The influence on the latter of parameter and model uncertainty evolves as a function of the available level of information about the modeled system behavior.
2020
global sensitivity analysis
multi model
statisical moments
Groundwater Hydrology
Hydrogeochemistry
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Dell_Oca_et_al(WRR-2020).pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Final manuscript
: Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione 1.81 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.81 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1149308
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact