Breathing Walls are building structures based on porous materials crossed by an airflow, which act both as building envelopes and ventilation system components. In climates where both heating and cooling are needed, a pro-flux configuration (heat and air mass both flowing in the same direction) might be alternated with a contra-flux configuration (heat and air mass flowing in opposite directions) during the year or even on a day. Understanding and modelling the Breathing Walls' stationary and dynamic behaviour is thus fundamental, in order to optimize their design and to fully exploit their energy-saving potential. In this experimental study, a small-scale no-fines concrete Breathing Wall was investigated. The steady-state contra-flux tests performed in a Dual Air-Vented Thermal Box laboratory apparatus were used to derive the heat recovery efficiency of the sample as a function of the cross airflow velocity. The effectiveness of this technology was then evaluated in a virtual case study. An optimal airflow velocity across the Breathing Wall was found, leading to energy savings between 9% and 14%. Dynamic tests were performed assuming a sinusoidal variation of the operative temperature on one side of the sample. They showed how airflow velocity affected the Breathing Wall inertia and dynamic behaviour.
Measuring a Breathing Wall's effectiveness and dynamic behaviour
Alongi A.;Angelotti A.;Mazzarella L.
2019-01-01
Abstract
Breathing Walls are building structures based on porous materials crossed by an airflow, which act both as building envelopes and ventilation system components. In climates where both heating and cooling are needed, a pro-flux configuration (heat and air mass both flowing in the same direction) might be alternated with a contra-flux configuration (heat and air mass flowing in opposite directions) during the year or even on a day. Understanding and modelling the Breathing Walls' stationary and dynamic behaviour is thus fundamental, in order to optimize their design and to fully exploit their energy-saving potential. In this experimental study, a small-scale no-fines concrete Breathing Wall was investigated. The steady-state contra-flux tests performed in a Dual Air-Vented Thermal Box laboratory apparatus were used to derive the heat recovery efficiency of the sample as a function of the cross airflow velocity. The effectiveness of this technology was then evaluated in a virtual case study. An optimal airflow velocity across the Breathing Wall was found, leading to energy savings between 9% and 14%. Dynamic tests were performed assuming a sinusoidal variation of the operative temperature on one side of the sample. They showed how airflow velocity affected the Breathing Wall inertia and dynamic behaviour.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
IBE836457_published_online.pdf
Accesso riservato
Descrizione: articolo pubblicato
:
Publisher’s version
Dimensione
1.29 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.29 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
11311-1090429_Angelotti.pdf
accesso aperto
:
Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione
1.84 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.84 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.