It is widely known that the main framework for mCSEM imaging is the mathematical inversion of data, that in real applications (thus 3D model geometries) require great computational resources to be accomplished in reasonable time. It is also known from literature that non-inversion based imaging, through migration algorithms, both iterative or not, are feasible with a computational cost far lower with respect to inversion, although yielding images of resistivity contrasts or an apparent resistivity, but not a reliable resistivity estimation and associated uncertainty. Here some practical aspects of one-pass mCSEM migration and suggestions for some imaging improvement are analyzed.

Practical Aspects in mCSEM Migration

Bernasconi, G.
2016-01-01

Abstract

It is widely known that the main framework for mCSEM imaging is the mathematical inversion of data, that in real applications (thus 3D model geometries) require great computational resources to be accomplished in reasonable time. It is also known from literature that non-inversion based imaging, through migration algorithms, both iterative or not, are feasible with a computational cost far lower with respect to inversion, although yielding images of resistivity contrasts or an apparent resistivity, but not a reliable resistivity estimation and associated uncertainty. Here some practical aspects of one-pass mCSEM migration and suggestions for some imaging improvement are analyzed.
2016
978-94-6282-185-9
csem inversion
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2016_EAGE_We_P7_04.pdf

Accesso riservato

: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 746.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
746.73 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1039768
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact