We consider a passive investor who divides his capital between two assets: a risk-free money market instrument and an index fund, or an exchange-traded fund, tracking a broad market index. We model the evolution of the market index by a lognormal diffusion. The agent faces both fixed and proportional transaction costs and solvency constraints. The objective is to maximize the expected utility from the portfolio liquidation at a fixed horizon, but if the portfolio reaches a pre-set target value, then the position in the risky asset is liquidated. The model is formulated as a parabolic impulse control problem and we characterize the value function as the unique constrained viscosity solution of the associated quasi-variational inequality. We show the existence of an impulse policy which is arbitrarily close to the optimal one by reducing the model to a sequence of iterated optimal stopping problems. The value function and the quasi-optimal policy are computed numerically by an iterative finite element discretization technique. We present extended numerical results in the case of a constant relative risk aversion utility function, showing the non-stationary shape of the optimal strategy and how it varies with respect to the model parameters. The numerical experiments reveal that, even with small transaction costs and distant horizons, the optimal strategy is essentially a buy-and-hold trading strategy where the agent recalibrates his portfolio very few times.

Passive portfolio management over a finite horizon with a target liquidation value under transaction costs and solvency constraints

MARAZZINA, DANIELE
2016-01-01

Abstract

We consider a passive investor who divides his capital between two assets: a risk-free money market instrument and an index fund, or an exchange-traded fund, tracking a broad market index. We model the evolution of the market index by a lognormal diffusion. The agent faces both fixed and proportional transaction costs and solvency constraints. The objective is to maximize the expected utility from the portfolio liquidation at a fixed horizon, but if the portfolio reaches a pre-set target value, then the position in the risky asset is liquidated. The model is formulated as a parabolic impulse control problem and we characterize the value function as the unique constrained viscosity solution of the associated quasi-variational inequality. We show the existence of an impulse policy which is arbitrarily close to the optimal one by reducing the model to a sequence of iterated optimal stopping problems. The value function and the quasi-optimal policy are computed numerically by an iterative finite element discretization technique. We present extended numerical results in the case of a constant relative risk aversion utility function, showing the non-stationary shape of the optimal strategy and how it varies with respect to the model parameters. The numerical experiments reveal that, even with small transaction costs and distant horizons, the optimal strategy is essentially a buy-and-hold trading strategy where the agent recalibrates his portfolio very few times.
2016
Dynamic trading strategies; passive portfolio management; quasi-variational inequalities; solvency constraints; transaction costs; viscosity solutions; Management Information Systems; Modeling and Simulation; Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)2001 Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous); Strategy and Management1409 Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management; Management Science and Operations Research; Applied Mathematics
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
BaccarinMarazzina_rev.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
: Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione 384.41 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
384.41 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1000099
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact