Architecture and Systemics - in Praise of Roughness

Architecture is a complex idea in its own right. In architectural culture, systemic references are not new. Design theories, in Europe as well as in USA, have often referred to many concepts more or less strictly linked to Systemics and to scientific domains such as Information theories and Cybernetics. Quite often, such references have been a mere metaphorical suggestion or, as in the field of “rational” design and process engineering, they mostly have heavy functional overtones. Such is the idea of “performance”, whose original definition was meant as an industrial design tool pursuing optimization, linking together the users’ needs and the requirements an artifact must possess to satisfy those needs. But, as we know, “bottom up” emergence processes have nothing to do with “top down” design strategies for optimization. Nevertheless, the idea of performance conveys the meaning of a strong influence intercurring between two entities, one of them on the “giving” and the other one on the “taking” sides, both of them interacting through feedback. For this reason, I believe the idea of performance should not be discarded lightheartedly. Rather, a “softer” notion of performance, linked to the realm of social perception and attachment to places, should be brought to thorough definition. It might be useful to find a more productive, non-metaphorical use of systemic references to understand and (then) to design - or to redevelop - human settlements.