In this paper single-phase instantaneous reactive power (p-q) method and non-active current method have been compared. Reactive power and reactive current calculation using these methods have been considered here under distorted voltage and current waveforms. It has been shown that these two methods have some limitations for reactive power compensation. The p-q method with hysteresis current controller and non-active current theory with sinusoidal pulse width modulation (SPWM) controller have been analyzed in Matlab/Simulink. A prototype system has been designed using TMS320F2812 EzDSP in the laboratory and assessment based on simulation and experimental results is given for these methods in this paper.
Assessment of two different reactive power estimation methods on single phase loads
HAFEZI, HOSSEIN;
2014-01-01
Abstract
In this paper single-phase instantaneous reactive power (p-q) method and non-active current method have been compared. Reactive power and reactive current calculation using these methods have been considered here under distorted voltage and current waveforms. It has been shown that these two methods have some limitations for reactive power compensation. The p-q method with hysteresis current controller and non-active current theory with sinusoidal pulse width modulation (SPWM) controller have been analyzed in Matlab/Simulink. A prototype system has been designed using TMS320F2812 EzDSP in the laboratory and assessment based on simulation and experimental results is given for these methods in this paper.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
06980614.pdf
Accesso riservato
:
Publisher’s version
Dimensione
751.46 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
751.46 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.