Most energy conversion systems, and especially electricity generation plants, do not operate at nominal conditions throughout their useful life: periodic, semi-periodic and stochastic changes in the availability of the resource affect solar (thermal and PV), wind, hydraulic, and geothermal plants, which in reality operate at off-design conditions for most of their life. To a smaller extent, fossil-fuelled plants may also be plagued by fuel availability problems and no longer easily predictable demand oscillation. In spite of the ever growing net connectivity, since the demand curve in even larger geographic regions displays a typical quasi-sinusoidal shape, fleet load modulation is unavoidable. Naturally, off-design operation and load cycling affect the cost of the generated kWh. This paper presents a general thermoeconomic method to evaluate the economic and environmental effects of energy system integration, taking into account life cycle concerns (supply chains) and the effect of inefficiencies due to off-design operation of the systems. The method here is applied to a realistic case study of an Italian regional utility: an analysis of the implications of the variation of the productive mix between a photovoltaic power plant (PV) and a standard commercial, non-cogenerating gas turbine plant (GT) on the final cost of the electrical kWh. The demand curve is prescribed, and the effect of different mixes is assessed, both on the monetary and on the exergy cost of the electricity. The economic cost assessment is performed by standard thermoeconomic techniques, whereas the exergy costs are evaluated using both the Extended Exergy Accounting (EEA) and the Thermo-Ecological Cost (TEC) methods. The results show that a purely monetary cash flow accounting and thermoeconomics lead to contrasting results, and also that the EEA and TEC cost indicators generate different rankings among the studied alternative GT/PV mixes.

An exergy-based approach to the joint economic and environmental impact assessment of possible photovoltaic scenarios: A case study at a regional level in Italy

COLOMBO, EMANUELA;ROCCO, MATTEO VINCENZO;
2015-01-01

Abstract

Most energy conversion systems, and especially electricity generation plants, do not operate at nominal conditions throughout their useful life: periodic, semi-periodic and stochastic changes in the availability of the resource affect solar (thermal and PV), wind, hydraulic, and geothermal plants, which in reality operate at off-design conditions for most of their life. To a smaller extent, fossil-fuelled plants may also be plagued by fuel availability problems and no longer easily predictable demand oscillation. In spite of the ever growing net connectivity, since the demand curve in even larger geographic regions displays a typical quasi-sinusoidal shape, fleet load modulation is unavoidable. Naturally, off-design operation and load cycling affect the cost of the generated kWh. This paper presents a general thermoeconomic method to evaluate the economic and environmental effects of energy system integration, taking into account life cycle concerns (supply chains) and the effect of inefficiencies due to off-design operation of the systems. The method here is applied to a realistic case study of an Italian regional utility: an analysis of the implications of the variation of the productive mix between a photovoltaic power plant (PV) and a standard commercial, non-cogenerating gas turbine plant (GT) on the final cost of the electrical kWh. The demand curve is prescribed, and the effect of different mixes is assessed, both on the monetary and on the exergy cost of the electricity. The economic cost assessment is performed by standard thermoeconomic techniques, whereas the exergy costs are evaluated using both the Extended Exergy Accounting (EEA) and the Thermo-Ecological Cost (TEC) methods. The results show that a purely monetary cash flow accounting and thermoeconomics lead to contrasting results, and also that the EEA and TEC cost indicators generate different rankings among the studied alternative GT/PV mixes.
2015
Exergy; Thermoeconomics; Extended exergy accounting; Thermo-Ecological Cost; Off-design; Photovoltaic
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2014_ECOMOD_Colombo,Rocco,Toro,Sciubba_special issue chen.pdf

Accesso riservato

: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 1.69 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.69 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
An exergy-based approach to the joint economic and environmental impact_11311-968227_Rocco.pdf

accesso aperto

: Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione 1.6 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.6 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/968227
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact