What are the quality factors that define a “good” usability evaluation method and contribute to its acceptability and adoption in a real business context? How can we measure such factors? This paper investigates these issues and proposes to decompose the broad, general concept of “methodological quality” into more measurable, lower level attributes such as performance, efficiency, cost effectiveness, andlearnability. We exemplify how to measure such attributes, reporting an empirical evaluation study of a usability inspection method for web applications called MiLE+.

Quality of Web Usability Evaluation Methods: An Empirical Study on MiLE+

GARZOTTO, FRANCA
2007-01-01

Abstract

What are the quality factors that define a “good” usability evaluation method and contribute to its acceptability and adoption in a real business context? How can we measure such factors? This paper investigates these issues and proposes to decompose the broad, general concept of “methodological quality” into more measurable, lower level attributes such as performance, efficiency, cost effectiveness, andlearnability. We exemplify how to measure such attributes, reporting an empirical evaluation study of a usability inspection method for web applications called MiLE+.
2007
Web Information Systems Engineering Engineering – WISE 2007 Workshops
9783540770091
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Quality and potential for adoption - Wise 2007.pdf

Accesso riservato

: Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione 471.98 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
471.98 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/692863
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact