What are the quality factors that define a “good” usability evaluation method and contribute to its acceptability and adoption in a real business context? How can we measure such factors? This paper investigates these issues and proposes to decompose the broad, general concept of “methodological quality” into more measurable, lower level attributes such as performance, efficiency, cost effectiveness, andlearnability. We exemplify how to measure such attributes, reporting an empirical evaluation study of a usability inspection method for web applications called MiLE+.
Quality of Web Usability Evaluation Methods: An Empirical Study on MiLE+
GARZOTTO, FRANCA
2007-01-01
Abstract
What are the quality factors that define a “good” usability evaluation method and contribute to its acceptability and adoption in a real business context? How can we measure such factors? This paper investigates these issues and proposes to decompose the broad, general concept of “methodological quality” into more measurable, lower level attributes such as performance, efficiency, cost effectiveness, andlearnability. We exemplify how to measure such attributes, reporting an empirical evaluation study of a usability inspection method for web applications called MiLE+.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Quality and potential for adoption - Wise 2007.pdf
Accesso riservato
:
Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione
471.98 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
471.98 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.