Several proposals can be found, in literature, to split the responsibility for the injection of harmonic pollution between the different loads and between loads and source. The methods have been tested mainly by means of simulations performed on an industrial test system identified by the IEEE Task Force on Harmonic modeling and simulation. The main problem of simulation results is that they tend to disregard measurement uncertainty that, if not properly considered, might lead to an incorrect, or even impossible assessment of responsibility. This paper is therefore aimed at comparing the different available methods from a metrological point of view, in order to provide a wider and more complete basis for evaluating their performances.
A metrological comparison between different methods for harmonic pollution metering
FERRERO, ALESSANDRO;PRIOLI, MARCO;SALICONE, SIMONA
2011-01-01
Abstract
Several proposals can be found, in literature, to split the responsibility for the injection of harmonic pollution between the different loads and between loads and source. The methods have been tested mainly by means of simulations performed on an industrial test system identified by the IEEE Task Force on Harmonic modeling and simulation. The main problem of simulation results is that they tend to disregard measurement uncertainty that, if not properly considered, might lead to an incorrect, or even impossible assessment of responsibility. This paper is therefore aimed at comparing the different available methods from a metrological point of view, in order to provide a wider and more complete basis for evaluating their performances.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
AMPS2011_Proceedings.pdf
Accesso riservato
:
Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione
694.86 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
694.86 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.