A comparison between two types of helicopter fuselage panels with a traditional design of skin and stringers was carried out. Panels were made with the same geometrical shape and dimensions but with two different aluminium alloys for the skin: Conventional 2024 and 8090 Al–Li alloy. Two different crack locations were considered to be taken into account for the damage tolerant behavior of the two panel typologies: A crack into the skin between two stringers and a crack into the skin under the stringer after the removal of a complete section of the stringer. The crack growth was monitored during the fatigue load application, and a FE model was utilized in order to calculate the fracture mechanics parameters. The experimental data (crack growth rate da/dN) and the FE results (stress intensity range ΔKI) were checked with the crack propagation material data, withgood agreement. According to these results, it is possible to compare the damage tolerant behaviors of the panels made by the two different materials, with the purpose of optimizing crack propagation behavior versus weight in this fundamental helicopter component.

Comparison of Fatigue Crack Propagation Behavior of Al 2024 and Al–Li 8090 Helicopter Fuselage Panels

GIGLIO, MARCO;MANES, ANDREA;FOSSATI, MASSIMO;
2010-01-01

Abstract

A comparison between two types of helicopter fuselage panels with a traditional design of skin and stringers was carried out. Panels were made with the same geometrical shape and dimensions but with two different aluminium alloys for the skin: Conventional 2024 and 8090 Al–Li alloy. Two different crack locations were considered to be taken into account for the damage tolerant behavior of the two panel typologies: A crack into the skin between two stringers and a crack into the skin under the stringer after the removal of a complete section of the stringer. The crack growth was monitored during the fatigue load application, and a FE model was utilized in order to calculate the fracture mechanics parameters. The experimental data (crack growth rate da/dN) and the FE results (stress intensity range ΔKI) were checked with the crack propagation material data, withgood agreement. According to these results, it is possible to compare the damage tolerant behaviors of the panels made by the two different materials, with the purpose of optimizing crack propagation behavior versus weight in this fundamental helicopter component.
2010
fatigue; crack; Al–Li; experimental; FEM; helicopter frame
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Paper JTE101909.pdf

Accesso riservato

: Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione 632.09 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
632.09 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/572666
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact