In recent years, the concept of the “15-minute city” has gained prominence in in-ternational urban planning discourse as a model for enhancing urban livability through improved access to essential services within short distances. However, its rapid diffusion and the absence of a consolidated theoretical framework have led to a wide range of interpretations, resulting in the emergence of the broader and less clearly defined concept of the “X-minute city.” This study aims to move beyond the rhetoric of temporal proximity by developing a critical taxonomy of urban proximity models, based on three key dimensions: time threshold, type of services, and governance model. Through a comparative analysis of 35 case stud-ies, selected from capital cities and high-density urban areas, the research high-lights significant differences in the configuration of these models. These varia-tions reflect diverse approaches to managing urban time, service complexity, and decision-making processes. The findings are summarized in a ternary diagram that visualizes the main urban clusters, shedding light on both successful practic-es and recurring challenges. The study emphasizes the importance of a contextu-alized and strategic approach to proximity planning—one that can adapt to the specific social, spatial, and institutional characteristics of each territory. This arti-cle contributes to the scientific debate by offering a practical tool to distinguish between symbolic applications and real transformations. Ultimately, the future of urban proximity does not lie in strict adherence to a standard time threshold, but in the model’s ability to regenerate the relationship between urban space, citizen-ship rights, and quality of life.
Beyond 15 Minutes: A Taxonomy for the City of Proximity
Pinto Fulvia;
2026-01-01
Abstract
In recent years, the concept of the “15-minute city” has gained prominence in in-ternational urban planning discourse as a model for enhancing urban livability through improved access to essential services within short distances. However, its rapid diffusion and the absence of a consolidated theoretical framework have led to a wide range of interpretations, resulting in the emergence of the broader and less clearly defined concept of the “X-minute city.” This study aims to move beyond the rhetoric of temporal proximity by developing a critical taxonomy of urban proximity models, based on three key dimensions: time threshold, type of services, and governance model. Through a comparative analysis of 35 case stud-ies, selected from capital cities and high-density urban areas, the research high-lights significant differences in the configuration of these models. These varia-tions reflect diverse approaches to managing urban time, service complexity, and decision-making processes. The findings are summarized in a ternary diagram that visualizes the main urban clusters, shedding light on both successful practic-es and recurring challenges. The study emphasizes the importance of a contextu-alized and strategic approach to proximity planning—one that can adapt to the specific social, spatial, and institutional characteristics of each territory. This arti-cle contributes to the scientific debate by offering a practical tool to distinguish between symbolic applications and real transformations. Ultimately, the future of urban proximity does not lie in strict adherence to a standard time threshold, but in the model’s ability to regenerate the relationship between urban space, citizen-ship rights, and quality of life.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pinto-LaRocca-Springer-2026.pdf
Accesso riservato
Dimensione
2.52 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.52 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



