Air quality is a major public health concern, while particulate matter (PM) measurements remain limited by the spatial coverage and high operational costs of reference monitoring stations. This scoping review synthesises the literature on image-based PM estimation from outdoor photos as a potential low-cost approach to increase PM concentration sampling coverage. Methods are classified by input data requirements and modelling strategy, with summaries of performance and implementation resources. Results suggest that deep learning models generally exhibit the strongest predictive capability, although cross-study comparisons remain indicative, as they are limited by the availability of comparable metrics and by differences in geographic application contexts. Machine learning and physics-based methods are generally less accurate but more interpretable and computationally efficient, while hybrid approaches offer a promising trade-off between accuracy and operability. Nevertheless, most applications remain below reference regulatory accuracy levels. Training datasets are often limited in size and coverage, benchmarks are lacking, and code and data are not always available. Future work should prioritise multi-site datasets, improved hybrid models, and open resources to support reproducible model assessment and reuse.

Image-based estimation of ambient particulate matter: a scoping review

Oxoli, Daniele;Moazzam, Afshin;Brovelli, Maria Antonia;Li, Songnian;Pirotti, Francesco;
2026-01-01

Abstract

Air quality is a major public health concern, while particulate matter (PM) measurements remain limited by the spatial coverage and high operational costs of reference monitoring stations. This scoping review synthesises the literature on image-based PM estimation from outdoor photos as a potential low-cost approach to increase PM concentration sampling coverage. Methods are classified by input data requirements and modelling strategy, with summaries of performance and implementation resources. Results suggest that deep learning models generally exhibit the strongest predictive capability, although cross-study comparisons remain indicative, as they are limited by the availability of comparable metrics and by differences in geographic application contexts. Machine learning and physics-based methods are generally less accurate but more interpretable and computationally efficient, while hybrid approaches offer a promising trade-off between accuracy and operability. Nevertheless, most applications remain below reference regulatory accuracy levels. Training datasets are often limited in size and coverage, benchmarks are lacking, and code and data are not always available. Future work should prioritise multi-site datasets, improved hybrid models, and open resources to support reproducible model assessment and reuse.
2026
Air pollution monitoring, Particulate matter, PM2.5, Outdoor pictures, Image processing
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Oxoli_et_al_SPIR_2026.pdf

accesso aperto

: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 3.54 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.54 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1324645
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact