The relationship between architecture, memory, and space plays a crucial role in the musealization processes of sites associated with traumatic events of the second half of the twentieth century. Specifically, museums of memory located at so-called sites of perpetrators – such as former prisons, seats of totalitarian power, and concentration and extermination camps – are distinguished by their capacity to transform architecture into a «document». In these contexts, buildings are not merely exhibition display but become integral components of the narrative, embedding within themselves both the tangible and intangible traces of past events. A paradigmatic example of this approach is the case of the Topographie des Terrors in Berlin, noted for its capacity to maintain an indissoluble connection with the memory of the site. Other museum interventions, such as the Kazerne Dossin in Mechelen (2012), demonstrate how architecture can function as a narrative tool and space for collective reflection, mediating between traumatic pasts and contemporary memorial sensibilities. In sites of extermination, the introduction of visitor centers and museum pavilions, designed in dialogue with existing structures, responds to the necessity of welcoming visitors and providing appropriate interpretative tools. These architectures are characterized by an essential formal language, the use of raw materials, and spatial solutions aimed at prompting introspective experiences. From this perspective, the adaptive reuse of memory sites is a cultural act of design that preserves the symbolic significance of spaces, restoring meaning through measured architectural language. Exhibition design thus serves as a narrative instrument capable of activating dialogue between material traces and visitors. Consequently, these museums are not mere repositories of history but experiential spaces wherein memory takes form, and heritage becomes an opportunity for collective reflection.
Adaptive Reuse for Museums on Sites of Perpetrators
M. Bassanelli
2026-01-01
Abstract
The relationship between architecture, memory, and space plays a crucial role in the musealization processes of sites associated with traumatic events of the second half of the twentieth century. Specifically, museums of memory located at so-called sites of perpetrators – such as former prisons, seats of totalitarian power, and concentration and extermination camps – are distinguished by their capacity to transform architecture into a «document». In these contexts, buildings are not merely exhibition display but become integral components of the narrative, embedding within themselves both the tangible and intangible traces of past events. A paradigmatic example of this approach is the case of the Topographie des Terrors in Berlin, noted for its capacity to maintain an indissoluble connection with the memory of the site. Other museum interventions, such as the Kazerne Dossin in Mechelen (2012), demonstrate how architecture can function as a narrative tool and space for collective reflection, mediating between traumatic pasts and contemporary memorial sensibilities. In sites of extermination, the introduction of visitor centers and museum pavilions, designed in dialogue with existing structures, responds to the necessity of welcoming visitors and providing appropriate interpretative tools. These architectures are characterized by an essential formal language, the use of raw materials, and spatial solutions aimed at prompting introspective experiences. From this perspective, the adaptive reuse of memory sites is a cultural act of design that preserves the symbolic significance of spaces, restoring meaning through measured architectural language. Exhibition design thus serves as a narrative instrument capable of activating dialogue between material traces and visitors. Consequently, these museums are not mere repositories of history but experiential spaces wherein memory takes form, and heritage becomes an opportunity for collective reflection.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
icar_vol1_bassanelli.pdf
Accesso riservato
:
Publisher’s version
Dimensione
939.42 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
939.42 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


