To draw a detail at a scale of 1:1 is to approach construction from within the drawing itself—to trace, through the gesture, the tension between idea and matter, and to inhabit that narrow space where architecture begins to take shape, yet remains unresolved. The sheet of paper becomes a field of action, a site of physical and mental proximity, where what is drawn ceases to be representation and becomes search for relation. It is in this closeness, intimacy, that drawing begins to convey—almost to embody—the weight of things . This text emerges from a practice-based research context that explores drawing as a generative and epistemic tool in architecture. Rather than illustrating completed ideas, the drawings presented here act as investigative tools, ways of thinking through form, material, and relation. They belong to a design exercise conducted by the author, which takes its point of departure from a structural detail by Sigurd Lewerentz—used here as a cultural reference and trigger of reflection—but then develops autonomously as an independent exploration. In this sense, the drawings are not illustrations of a precedent but investigative tools within a broader research-by-design process, where architectural form is tested, varied, and re-imagined through drawing. Moving across the scales of the detail, the joint, and the fragment, the essay reflects on how drawing, especially at full scale, can operate as a ‘maieutic exercise’: an open, iterative, and embodied form of projectual knowledge.
What’s in a Detail? Drawing as Maieutic Exercise in Architectural Design
E. Miglietta
2026-01-01
Abstract
To draw a detail at a scale of 1:1 is to approach construction from within the drawing itself—to trace, through the gesture, the tension between idea and matter, and to inhabit that narrow space where architecture begins to take shape, yet remains unresolved. The sheet of paper becomes a field of action, a site of physical and mental proximity, where what is drawn ceases to be representation and becomes search for relation. It is in this closeness, intimacy, that drawing begins to convey—almost to embody—the weight of things . This text emerges from a practice-based research context that explores drawing as a generative and epistemic tool in architecture. Rather than illustrating completed ideas, the drawings presented here act as investigative tools, ways of thinking through form, material, and relation. They belong to a design exercise conducted by the author, which takes its point of departure from a structural detail by Sigurd Lewerentz—used here as a cultural reference and trigger of reflection—but then develops autonomously as an independent exploration. In this sense, the drawings are not illustrations of a precedent but investigative tools within a broader research-by-design process, where architectural form is tested, varied, and re-imagined through drawing. Moving across the scales of the detail, the joint, and the fragment, the essay reflects on how drawing, especially at full scale, can operate as a ‘maieutic exercise’: an open, iterative, and embodied form of projectual knowledge.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
The-Drawing-and-the-Space_EM_Essay.pdf
accesso aperto
:
Publisher’s version
Dimensione
6.2 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
6.2 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


