Digital platforms are typically theorized as bounded ecosystems that scale through cross-side network effects, ecosystem expansion, and competitive dynamics. Yet as dominant platforms mature, their interactions increasingly extend beyond rivalry. This paper investigates the emergence of “nested platforms,” defined as platforms that retain their own multi-sided ecosystem while operating as structured complements within another dominant platform’s architecture. Drawing on a large-scale archival qualitative study of 154 nested platform relationships identified across 100 leading digital platforms, we examine their diffusion, configurational patterns, and strategic logic. The findings show that nested platforms are neither anecdotal nor random. Nesting is strongly directional, with innovation platforms disproportionately acting as hosts and transactional platforms more frequently appearing as guests. Complementarity patterns are also structured: vertical complementarity is concentrated in innovation-led configurations, whereas horizontal complementarity is especially prevalent in innovation–transactional pairings. In addition, three recurring interface configurations emerge, ranging from parallel embedding to full functional absorption, reflecting increasing degrees of architectural coupling between host and guest platforms. The paper contributes to platform research in three ways. First, it extends complementarity theory by showing that complementarities can operate across autonomous platform architectures rather than only within a focal ecosystem. Second, it refines assumptions of stable role separation by showing how platforms can simultaneously act as orchestrators and complements across ecosystems. Third, it reconceptualizes interface design as a manifestation of structural interdependence in mature platform markets.

The Rise of Nested Platforms: Understanding Platform Integration as a New Strategic Frontier

Daniel Trabucchi;Tommaso Buganza;
2026-01-01

Abstract

Digital platforms are typically theorized as bounded ecosystems that scale through cross-side network effects, ecosystem expansion, and competitive dynamics. Yet as dominant platforms mature, their interactions increasingly extend beyond rivalry. This paper investigates the emergence of “nested platforms,” defined as platforms that retain their own multi-sided ecosystem while operating as structured complements within another dominant platform’s architecture. Drawing on a large-scale archival qualitative study of 154 nested platform relationships identified across 100 leading digital platforms, we examine their diffusion, configurational patterns, and strategic logic. The findings show that nested platforms are neither anecdotal nor random. Nesting is strongly directional, with innovation platforms disproportionately acting as hosts and transactional platforms more frequently appearing as guests. Complementarity patterns are also structured: vertical complementarity is concentrated in innovation-led configurations, whereas horizontal complementarity is especially prevalent in innovation–transactional pairings. In addition, three recurring interface configurations emerge, ranging from parallel embedding to full functional absorption, reflecting increasing degrees of architectural coupling between host and guest platforms. The paper contributes to platform research in three ways. First, it extends complementarity theory by showing that complementarities can operate across autonomous platform architectures rather than only within a focal ecosystem. Second, it refines assumptions of stable role separation by showing how platforms can simultaneously act as orchestrators and complements across ecosystems. Third, it reconceptualizes interface design as a manifestation of structural interdependence in mature platform markets.
2026
33rd Innovation and Product Development Management Conference (IPDMC)
0019987374
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1317813
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact