Quality management in construction projects is critical for ensuring client satisfaction, minimizing rework, and achieving cost efficiency in an industry characterized by a long history of cost overruns. Traditional quality assurance and control (QA/QC) processes, however, are resource-intensive and often implemented without a systematic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness. Absent a systematic evaluation of the costs and benefits associated with QA/QC, stakeholders—particularly clients and contractors—are unlikely to commit resources to the implementation of quality control practices within construction projects. This paper presents a quantitative optimization framework that integrates Monte Carlo simulation of activity-level rework costs with a constrained optimization model based on a novel project-level key performance indicator, the Total Assurance on Reworks (TAR) to support data-driven decision-making in project quality management. The model en- ables construction managers to evaluate trade-offs between the costs of preventive quality controls and the potential consequences of non-conformities. The methodology is demon- strated through a synthetic dataset comprising 50 construction activities. Results indicate that the framework can identify optimal allocations of quality control resources, achieving up to more than 19% cost savings compared to a full-control strategy and 18% reduction in economic resources when compared with the state of the art while maintaining target quality assurance levels. This contributes to the broader discourse on quality manage- ment by offering a computationally rigorous tool for balancing cost efficiency and quality performance in complex projects.

A Data-Driven Optimization Framework for Project Quality Management in Construction

Re Cecconi, Fulvio;
2026-01-01

Abstract

Quality management in construction projects is critical for ensuring client satisfaction, minimizing rework, and achieving cost efficiency in an industry characterized by a long history of cost overruns. Traditional quality assurance and control (QA/QC) processes, however, are resource-intensive and often implemented without a systematic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness. Absent a systematic evaluation of the costs and benefits associated with QA/QC, stakeholders—particularly clients and contractors—are unlikely to commit resources to the implementation of quality control practices within construction projects. This paper presents a quantitative optimization framework that integrates Monte Carlo simulation of activity-level rework costs with a constrained optimization model based on a novel project-level key performance indicator, the Total Assurance on Reworks (TAR) to support data-driven decision-making in project quality management. The model en- ables construction managers to evaluate trade-offs between the costs of preventive quality controls and the potential consequences of non-conformities. The methodology is demon- strated through a synthetic dataset comprising 50 construction activities. Results indicate that the framework can identify optimal allocations of quality control resources, achieving up to more than 19% cost savings compared to a full-control strategy and 18% reduction in economic resources when compared with the state of the art while maintaining target quality assurance levels. This contributes to the broader discourse on quality manage- ment by offering a computationally rigorous tool for balancing cost efficiency and quality performance in complex projects.
2026
project quality management; expected monetary value; Monte Carlo simulations; construction projects; data-driven decision-making
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
buildings-16-01017.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo
: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 2.55 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.55 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1307504
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact