Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping e-learning, especially in technical and industrial training. Yet the literature still lacks cross-platform evidence on how different tools compare in pedagogy, scalability and ethics. Addressing this gap, we present a structured comparison of six leading AI platforms Duolingo, Squirrel AI, DreamBox, Gradescope, Knewton Alta and ChatGPT examining their algorithms, personalization depth, and instructional impact. Results show that reinforcementlearning tutors (Squirrel AI, DreamBox) deliver the highest personalization but offer limited model transparency, while ruleguided systems (Gradescope) scale well but adapt only modestly. ChatGPT provides broad subject coverage and cloud-level scalability, yet remains vulnerable to prompt bias and medium explainability. We also identify systemic challenges around data privacy, algorithmic fairness and equitable access. By synthesizing strengths and limitations, the study offers actionable guidance for educators, developers and policymakers seeking to deploy scalable, pedagogically grounded and ethically responsible AI in industrial e-learning contexts, and outlines future directions for standardized evaluation, built-in ethics, and policy frameworks.

AI in Education: A Comparative Study of Intelligent Systems and Their Impacts on Modern Learning Environments

Dhingra S.;Gruosso G.;Gajani G. S.
2025-01-01

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping e-learning, especially in technical and industrial training. Yet the literature still lacks cross-platform evidence on how different tools compare in pedagogy, scalability and ethics. Addressing this gap, we present a structured comparison of six leading AI platforms Duolingo, Squirrel AI, DreamBox, Gradescope, Knewton Alta and ChatGPT examining their algorithms, personalization depth, and instructional impact. Results show that reinforcementlearning tutors (Squirrel AI, DreamBox) deliver the highest personalization but offer limited model transparency, while ruleguided systems (Gradescope) scale well but adapt only modestly. ChatGPT provides broad subject coverage and cloud-level scalability, yet remains vulnerable to prompt bias and medium explainability. We also identify systemic challenges around data privacy, algorithmic fairness and equitable access. By synthesizing strengths and limitations, the study offers actionable guidance for educators, developers and policymakers seeking to deploy scalable, pedagogically grounded and ethically responsible AI in industrial e-learning contexts, and outlines future directions for standardized evaluation, built-in ethics, and policy frameworks.
2025
2025 IEEE 12th International Conference on E-Learning in Industrial Electronics, ICELIE 2025
adaptive learning
Artificial intelligence in education
explainable AI
intelligent tutoring systems
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
_Dhingra__ICELIE_2025___AI_in_Education__A_Comparative_Study_of_Intelligent_Systems_and_Their_Impacts_on_Modern_Learning_Environments.pdf

Accesso riservato

: Pre-Print (o Pre-Refereeing)
Dimensione 381.24 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
381.24 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1307081
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact