It is important that a clinical laboratory has implemented appropriate procedures for quality control, which includes both internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assessment (EQA) with the common goal to detect systematic errors and random errors. It is the case for both the Hemohub® Bayesian tools for IQC results interpretation and the ECAT EQA optimised bivariate z-scores analysis. On a concrete case study, we demonstrate both the higher sensitivity and specificity of optimised bivariate z-scores analysis than the univariate approach. The Bayesian IQC results interpretation like the ECAT analysis confirmed the explicit conclusion i.e. an increase of the random error corresponding to the increase of the inter assay coefficient of variation (CV) at the date of EQA samples runs. Improvement of repaired dysfunction could be then daily observed on IQC results and then confirmed on EQA results thanks to the complementarity of the two approaches.

Complementarity between Bayesian Internal Quality Control results management and External Quality Assessment bivariate z-score analysis: application to a concrete case study

Tsiamyrtzis, Panagiotis
2025-01-01

Abstract

It is important that a clinical laboratory has implemented appropriate procedures for quality control, which includes both internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assessment (EQA) with the common goal to detect systematic errors and random errors. It is the case for both the Hemohub® Bayesian tools for IQC results interpretation and the ECAT EQA optimised bivariate z-scores analysis. On a concrete case study, we demonstrate both the higher sensitivity and specificity of optimised bivariate z-scores analysis than the univariate approach. The Bayesian IQC results interpretation like the ECAT analysis confirmed the explicit conclusion i.e. an increase of the random error corresponding to the increase of the inter assay coefficient of variation (CV) at the date of EQA samples runs. Improvement of repaired dysfunction could be then daily observed on IQC results and then confirmed on EQA results thanks to the complementarity of the two approaches.
2025
Il est important que les laboratoires de biologie médicale aient mis en œuvre des procédures appropriées pour le contrôle de la qualité, qui comprend à la fois le contrôle interne de la qualité (CIQ) et l’évaluation externe de la qualité (EEQ) dans le but commun de détecter les erreurs systématiques et les erreurs aléatoires. C’est le cas avec les outils bayésiens Hemohub® pour l’interprétation des résultats du CIQ et l’analyse bivariée optimisée des z-scores offerte par l’organisme d’EEQ ECAT. Sur une étude de cas concrète, nous démontrons que la sensibilité et la spécificité de l’analyse bivariée optimisée des scores z sont supérieures à celles de l’approche univariée. L’interprétation bayésienne des résultats du CIQ comme l’analyse de l’organisme ECAT ont confirmé explicitement une augmentation de l’erreur aléatoire correspondant à l’augmentation du coefficient de variation (CV) inter-essais à la date de l’analyse des échantillons de l’EEQ. La complémentarité de l’analyse CIQ-EEQ a objectivé l’efficacité de la correction du dysfonctionnement de l’automate à l’origine d’un accroissement de l’erreur aléatoire.
bayesian approach
external quality assessment
internal quality controls
random error
systematic error
z-score
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Complementarity between Bayesian Internal Quality Control results management and External Quality Assessment bivariate z-score analysis application to a concrete case study.pdf

accesso aperto

: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 205.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
205.96 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1306294
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact