There has been growing interest in the role of interpersonal ties within and between organizations. This paper explores why firms adopt formal, organization-led practices that have built into them the promotion of ties between employees. The latter would include organizationally promoted network- ing (OPN), teamworking, mentoring, and development cen- tres; we assess how their usage varies across different varieties of capitalism. We situate our study at the intersec- tion of HRM and comparative institutional analysis, arguing that national institutional frameworks influence whether and how firms deploy internal mechanisms to foster employee development through relationship building. Using data from over 4,800 organizations across 27 countries, we find that HR practices that deepen ties between employees are more prevalent in coordinated market economies (CMEs) than in liberal market economies (LMEs), and least common in peripheral economies (MMEs and EMEs). These findings con- tribute to the literature by highlighting how institutional contexts shape firm-level networking building practices, accordingly extending both the varieties of capitalism and international HRM literatures.

NETWORK BUILDING HR PRACTICES UNDER DIFFERENT CAPITALISMS

Marianna Marra;
2026-01-01

Abstract

There has been growing interest in the role of interpersonal ties within and between organizations. This paper explores why firms adopt formal, organization-led practices that have built into them the promotion of ties between employees. The latter would include organizationally promoted network- ing (OPN), teamworking, mentoring, and development cen- tres; we assess how their usage varies across different varieties of capitalism. We situate our study at the intersec- tion of HRM and comparative institutional analysis, arguing that national institutional frameworks influence whether and how firms deploy internal mechanisms to foster employee development through relationship building. Using data from over 4,800 organizations across 27 countries, we find that HR practices that deepen ties between employees are more prevalent in coordinated market economies (CMEs) than in liberal market economies (LMEs), and least common in peripheral economies (MMEs and EMEs). These findings con- tribute to the literature by highlighting how institutional contexts shape firm-level networking building practices, accordingly extending both the varieties of capitalism and international HRM literatures.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Marra2026IJHRM.pdf

Accesso riservato

: Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione 503.3 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
503.3 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1304750
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact