According to a local legend, Saturn, banished from Olympus, sought refuge in Ciociaria, where he taught humanity the arts and crafts and ushered in the Golden Age. The seven cities with megalithic walls, believed to have been founded by the Roman god himself, are said to bear witness to this legacy. This historical polycentrism, intertwined with complex administrative boundaries and geopolitical relationships, has progressively been overlaid by externally driven processes of transformation. The Bourbon reforms, the establishment of military industries, and, subsequently, the development policies implemented by the Cassa per il Mezzogiorno (Fund for the Development of Southern Italy) have left a profound imprint on the territory. Operating according to an extractive logic, these interventions failed to establish lasting productive structures, instead generating a condition of inertia that has maintained the area in an unstable balance between innovation and stagnation. Ciociaria represents not only an emblematic case of the territorial dynamics characteristic of Central Italy’s intermediate regions, but also a distinctive one, owing to its proximity to a metropolitan centre as economically and socially attractive as Rome. From this perspective, drawing on the ancient designation Latium adiectum, meaning ‘added Latium’, the territory is interpreted as a kind of ‘additional province’, situated between the metropolitan fringes and urban-rural contexts, yet consistently remaining within Rome’s sphere of influence. This condition translates into a persistent tension between belonging and marginality, between a subordinate functional role and an unrealised aspiration to autonomy, alongside the conviction that the area’s future remains inextricably linked to its relationship with the capital. These dynamics are reflected in a territory characterised by fragile balances, where ancient historic settlements coexist with fragmented and unplanned urbanisation, abandoned industrial sites, and new logistics hubs emerging from processes of productive restructuring. Nevertheless, alongside major infrastructure developments, resilient rural landscapes, collective memories, and opportunities for renewal endure, while the broader landscape alternates between environmental degradation and a widespread wealth of natural assets. This unresolved coexistence of incomplete modernisation and enduring historical traces makes Ciociaria a territory of striking contrasts, where the past persists and the future struggles to take shape around a coherent and tangible territorial identity.
Una leggenda locale narra della fuga di Saturno, cacciato dall'Olimpo e approdato in Ciociaria, dove avrebbe insegnato agli uomini la tecnica e avviato l'età dell'oro. Testimonianze di questo lascito sarebbero le sette città dalle mure megalitiche, fondate dallo stesso dio romano. Questo storico policentrismo, intrecciato a confini amministrativi e rapporti geopolitici complessi, è stato progressivamente sovrapposto da dinamiche esterne. Le riforme borboniche, l’insediamento delle industrie belliche e, più tardi, le politiche della Cassa per il Mezzogiorno, hanno lasciato segni profondi, operando secondo una logica estrattiva che non ha generato assetti produttivi duraturi, ma ha piuttosto prodotto una condizione di inerzia, mantenendo il territorio in un equilibrio instabile tra innovazione e immobilismo. La Ciociaria rappresenta non solo un caso emblematico delle dinamiche territoriali tipiche dell’Italia di Mezzo, ma anche unico, perché prossima a un polo metropolitano così attrattivo come quello di Roma. In questa prospettiva, con un richiamo all’antica denominazione di Latium adiectum, «Lazio aggiunto», il territorio viene interpretato come una sorta di “provincia aggiunta”, a cavallo tra frange metropolitane e i contesti urbano-rurali, sempre nell’orbita di Roma. Questa condizione si traduce in una tensione continua tra appartenenza e marginalità, tra funzione servente e autonomia mancata e al contempo nella convinzione che anche il futuro dell’area passi dal rapporto con la capitale. Tutto ciò si riflette in un territorio dagli equilibri fragili, dove antichi nuclei storici convivono con forme disordinate di urbanizzazione, aree industriali dismesse e nuovi poli logistici nati dalla riconversione produttiva. Eppure, accanto a grandi infrastrutture pesanti, permangono trame rurali resistenti, memorie collettive, occasioni di riscatto, mentre il paesaggio alterna condizioni di degrado ambientale e valori naturalistici diffusi. Questa compresenza irrisolta tra modernità incompiuta e tracce storiche fa della Ciociaria un territorio di forti contrasti, dove il passato persiste e il futuro fatica a delinearsi in un’identità concreta.
La Provincia aggiunta. La Ciociaria, il Nord del Sud.
Chiara Nifosi';Federico De Angelis;Paolo Beria;Enrico Formato;Filippo Romano
2025-01-01
Abstract
According to a local legend, Saturn, banished from Olympus, sought refuge in Ciociaria, where he taught humanity the arts and crafts and ushered in the Golden Age. The seven cities with megalithic walls, believed to have been founded by the Roman god himself, are said to bear witness to this legacy. This historical polycentrism, intertwined with complex administrative boundaries and geopolitical relationships, has progressively been overlaid by externally driven processes of transformation. The Bourbon reforms, the establishment of military industries, and, subsequently, the development policies implemented by the Cassa per il Mezzogiorno (Fund for the Development of Southern Italy) have left a profound imprint on the territory. Operating according to an extractive logic, these interventions failed to establish lasting productive structures, instead generating a condition of inertia that has maintained the area in an unstable balance between innovation and stagnation. Ciociaria represents not only an emblematic case of the territorial dynamics characteristic of Central Italy’s intermediate regions, but also a distinctive one, owing to its proximity to a metropolitan centre as economically and socially attractive as Rome. From this perspective, drawing on the ancient designation Latium adiectum, meaning ‘added Latium’, the territory is interpreted as a kind of ‘additional province’, situated between the metropolitan fringes and urban-rural contexts, yet consistently remaining within Rome’s sphere of influence. This condition translates into a persistent tension between belonging and marginality, between a subordinate functional role and an unrealised aspiration to autonomy, alongside the conviction that the area’s future remains inextricably linked to its relationship with the capital. These dynamics are reflected in a territory characterised by fragile balances, where ancient historic settlements coexist with fragmented and unplanned urbanisation, abandoned industrial sites, and new logistics hubs emerging from processes of productive restructuring. Nevertheless, alongside major infrastructure developments, resilient rural landscapes, collective memories, and opportunities for renewal endure, while the broader landscape alternates between environmental degradation and a widespread wealth of natural assets. This unresolved coexistence of incomplete modernisation and enduring historical traces makes Ciociaria a territory of striking contrasts, where the past persists and the future struggles to take shape around a coherent and tangible territorial identity.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
04_La provincia aggiunta_Nifosi-DeAngelis-Beria.pdf
accesso aperto
:
Publisher’s version
Dimensione
62.38 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
62.38 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



