This paper presents a comparative evaluation of six cloud-based platforms including ArcGIS Online, Cintoo, Flai, Pointly, Cesium ion, and Atis.cloud for historic garden conservation, applied to two contrasting case studies: the complex, large-scale Naxos Archaeological Park and the compact, formal Villa Burba in Italy. Results show that Cesium ion and Cintoo performed strongly in point cloud visualization, with Cesium ion offering responsive large-scale rendering and Cintoo supporting high-precision geometry and version control. Flai demonstrated effective AI-driven element classification, particularly in heterogeneous landscapes, while Pointly required manual refinement and showed limited adaptability to organic features. ArcGIS Online excelled in stakeholder usability and layered documentation but lacked native 3D analytics. Collaborative functions were best addressed by Cintoo and Atis.cloud. Temporal functionality, such as phase comparison or seasonal tracking, remained limited, with no platform providing fully integrated support. The study highlights the fragmented nature of current solutions and argues for a modular, garden-oriented CDE model, integrating semantic intelligence, temporal awareness, and stakeholder-specific interfaces to support adaptive, sustainability-sensitive historic garden conservation in the cloud.

Historic Garden Conservation in the Cloud: A Comparative Exploration of Strengths, Weaknesses, and Possibilities

Fangming Li;Cristiana Achille;Francesco Fassi
2025-01-01

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative evaluation of six cloud-based platforms including ArcGIS Online, Cintoo, Flai, Pointly, Cesium ion, and Atis.cloud for historic garden conservation, applied to two contrasting case studies: the complex, large-scale Naxos Archaeological Park and the compact, formal Villa Burba in Italy. Results show that Cesium ion and Cintoo performed strongly in point cloud visualization, with Cesium ion offering responsive large-scale rendering and Cintoo supporting high-precision geometry and version control. Flai demonstrated effective AI-driven element classification, particularly in heterogeneous landscapes, while Pointly required manual refinement and showed limited adaptability to organic features. ArcGIS Online excelled in stakeholder usability and layered documentation but lacked native 3D analytics. Collaborative functions were best addressed by Cintoo and Atis.cloud. Temporal functionality, such as phase comparison or seasonal tracking, remained limited, with no platform providing fully integrated support. The study highlights the fragmented nature of current solutions and argues for a modular, garden-oriented CDE model, integrating semantic intelligence, temporal awareness, and stakeholder-specific interfaces to support adaptive, sustainability-sensitive historic garden conservation in the cloud.
2025
Historic Garden, Cultural Heritage Management, Point Cloud, Cloud-Based Platforms, Common Data Environment, AI.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-9-2025-827-2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo pubblicato
: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 1.8 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.8 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1298626
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact