The correct evaluation of flows at transitional Reynolds number in nuclear reactors is gaining higher importance in relation to the accident analysis for buoyancy-driven flows which dominate the heat decay removal process. In the present paper a comparative study of different turbulence modeling and wall treatment for the evaluation of a fluid flow in transitional Reynolds number, is presented employing computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The relative performance of the models is assessed through benchmarking of fully developed pipe flow at Reynolds number 4900 and of a 90° bend pipe at Reynolds number 5000. Predictions of velocity profiles at different locations are compared to both experimental and accurate numerical simulations. It has been found that the predictions between the models can vary considerably in particular in relation to the different wall treatment employed on the wall. The results show the concerns about the employment of the available turbulence models and wall treatments in low Reynolds number flow regimes and explanation is provided in relation to their formulation. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Numerical investigation of bent pipe flows at transitional Reynolds number

Pellegrini M.;Ninokata H.
2011-01-01

Abstract

The correct evaluation of flows at transitional Reynolds number in nuclear reactors is gaining higher importance in relation to the accident analysis for buoyancy-driven flows which dominate the heat decay removal process. In the present paper a comparative study of different turbulence modeling and wall treatment for the evaluation of a fluid flow in transitional Reynolds number, is presented employing computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The relative performance of the models is assessed through benchmarking of fully developed pipe flow at Reynolds number 4900 and of a 90° bend pipe at Reynolds number 5000. Predictions of velocity profiles at different locations are compared to both experimental and accurate numerical simulations. It has been found that the predictions between the models can vary considerably in particular in relation to the different wall treatment employed on the wall. The results show the concerns about the employment of the available turbulence models and wall treatments in low Reynolds number flow regimes and explanation is provided in relation to their formulation. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2011
Bent pipes
CFD
Fully developed pipes
Transitional Reynolds number
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
02_2011_Pellegrini_BentPipeTransitionalReynolds_PNE.pdf

Accesso riservato

: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 490.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
490.08 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1292865
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact