This chapter stems from the evidence of a fact: the largest number of graduates in service design or related disciplines is female, and this also happens in the professional field. An inquiry has been conducted to better understand this issue, combining quantitative and qualitative data: on one side, ten design schools all over the world were asked about their percentage of women among service design students; on the other, five in-depth interviews were done with practitioners coming from different experiences in the consultancy area. Then, four hypotheses about the cause of this fact are proposed, and they provocatively overlap with four widespread gender stereotypes: empathy, as women are considered particularly good at exer- cising it; multitasking, as women are generally considered better at it; aversion to STEM as women usually stay away from these subjects; social purpose, as women are generally inclined to deal with social issues. Such hypotheses/stereotypes are discussed based on the conversations conducted with the five interviewees and on the connected scientific literature: they are still under discussion, but some of them present interesting elements that would lead to their confirmation. At the end of the chapter, a reflection is presented about women’s leadership in the service design field, and a possible roadmap to grow it is suggested: it is about better valuing some abil- ities like listening, understanding, facilitating, orchestrating the overall experience and, above all, the ability to ‘stay in the process’ without having immediate results and navigate the contemporary complexity.
Service Design is Woman. An Inquiry on the Massive Presence of Women in the Service Design Field.
Daniela Selloni
2025-01-01
Abstract
This chapter stems from the evidence of a fact: the largest number of graduates in service design or related disciplines is female, and this also happens in the professional field. An inquiry has been conducted to better understand this issue, combining quantitative and qualitative data: on one side, ten design schools all over the world were asked about their percentage of women among service design students; on the other, five in-depth interviews were done with practitioners coming from different experiences in the consultancy area. Then, four hypotheses about the cause of this fact are proposed, and they provocatively overlap with four widespread gender stereotypes: empathy, as women are considered particularly good at exer- cising it; multitasking, as women are generally considered better at it; aversion to STEM as women usually stay away from these subjects; social purpose, as women are generally inclined to deal with social issues. Such hypotheses/stereotypes are discussed based on the conversations conducted with the five interviewees and on the connected scientific literature: they are still under discussion, but some of them present interesting elements that would lead to their confirmation. At the end of the chapter, a reflection is presented about women’s leadership in the service design field, and a possible roadmap to grow it is suggested: it is about better valuing some abil- ities like listening, understanding, facilitating, orchestrating the overall experience and, above all, the ability to ‘stay in the process’ without having immediate results and navigate the contemporary complexity.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Service Design is Woman_SELLONI .pdf
Accesso riservato
Dimensione
542.9 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
542.9 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


