The expansion of human activities has led to a critical extension of the human impact on the planetary environment, contributing to the emergence of the so-called “Technosphere”. In this context, the Anthropocene requires a rethinking of environmental management strategies, so that development activities are compatible with the conservation of ecosystems. This study analyzes the paradox of land reclamation in the Maldives, an archipelago characterized by high vulnerability to climate change and sea level rise. Although the creation of artificial land is promoted as a solution to habitat loss and urban expansion, it turns out to be one of the main factors of ecological degradation, with significant consequences on the stability of marine ecosystems and the integrity of coral reefs. Through a comparative analysis of the cases of Hulhulé, Farukolhufushi and Hulhumalé, this work examines the socio-environmental implications of government strategies for resettlement and land reclamation, highlighting their limitations and contradictions. The research highlights how territorial development policies are often guided by economic and infrastructural interests rather than by real ecological sustainability, leading to a progressive compromise of essential ecosystem services. In the face of these critical issues, alternative strategies are being explored, such as floating urbanization and the ecological restoration of coral reefs, assessing their feasibility and potential impact. The research proposes an integrated approach that combines the disciplines of ecology, architecture and urban planning, recognizing the central role of the ocean in regulating global ecosystem balances. The adoption of innovative strategies for land management is essential to ensure the environmental resilience and sustainability of island communities, contributing to a transition towards development models compatible with the protection of marine ecosystems.
Stolen land. Disappearing islands and the Maldivian paradox
Beatrice Azzola;
2024-01-01
Abstract
The expansion of human activities has led to a critical extension of the human impact on the planetary environment, contributing to the emergence of the so-called “Technosphere”. In this context, the Anthropocene requires a rethinking of environmental management strategies, so that development activities are compatible with the conservation of ecosystems. This study analyzes the paradox of land reclamation in the Maldives, an archipelago characterized by high vulnerability to climate change and sea level rise. Although the creation of artificial land is promoted as a solution to habitat loss and urban expansion, it turns out to be one of the main factors of ecological degradation, with significant consequences on the stability of marine ecosystems and the integrity of coral reefs. Through a comparative analysis of the cases of Hulhulé, Farukolhufushi and Hulhumalé, this work examines the socio-environmental implications of government strategies for resettlement and land reclamation, highlighting their limitations and contradictions. The research highlights how territorial development policies are often guided by economic and infrastructural interests rather than by real ecological sustainability, leading to a progressive compromise of essential ecosystem services. In the face of these critical issues, alternative strategies are being explored, such as floating urbanization and the ecological restoration of coral reefs, assessing their feasibility and potential impact. The research proposes an integrated approach that combines the disciplines of ecology, architecture and urban planning, recognizing the central role of the ocean in regulating global ecosystem balances. The adoption of innovative strategies for land management is essential to ensure the environmental resilience and sustainability of island communities, contributing to a transition towards development models compatible with the protection of marine ecosystems.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
75-Chapter Manuscript-3366-1-10-20240916.pdf
accesso aperto
:
Publisher’s version
Dimensione
727.36 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
727.36 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


