Renato De Fusco has repeatedly stated that interior architecture does not exist. The essay briefly traces the development of this idea, focusing on the theories that subsume De Fusco’s Storia dell’arredamento (1985) and how the binomial envelope/enclosure, defined by him in the semiotic-structuralist vision of architecture, leaves no doubt to misunderstandings: furnishing concerns the faces of the enclosure, but with Le Corbusier it loses its raison d’être, and from now on we will only speak of architecture or design.
Arredamento versus Architettura degli interni
I. Forino
2024-01-01
Abstract
Renato De Fusco has repeatedly stated that interior architecture does not exist. The essay briefly traces the development of this idea, focusing on the theories that subsume De Fusco’s Storia dell’arredamento (1985) and how the binomial envelope/enclosure, defined by him in the semiotic-structuralist vision of architecture, leaves no doubt to misunderstandings: furnishing concerns the faces of the enclosure, but with Le Corbusier it loses its raison d’être, and from now on we will only speak of architecture or design.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
download.pdf
Accesso riservato
Descrizione: text
:
Publisher’s version
Dimensione
1.96 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.96 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
