In the phase-field modeling of fracture, the search for a physically reasonable and computationally feasible criterion to split the elastic energy density into fractions that may or may not contribute to crack propagation has been the subject of many recent studies. Within this context, we propose an energy split - or energy decomposition - aimed at accurately representing the evolution of a crack under load reversal. To this purpose, two key assumptions are made. First, the damage gradient direction is interpreted as being representative of the normal-to- crack direction, as already assumed in previous works in the literature. The second assumption consists of considering the sign of the projection of the stress tensor onto the damage gradient direction at a point as an indicator of whether this point should behave as an opening or as a closing crack. We associate the latter case (crack closing) to both (a) a complete recovery of elastic energy density of the intact material (i.e., perfectly rough crack surfaces) and (b) a zero crack driving force at that point. The first case (crack opening) is treated classically as a damageable material point at which damage can increase. The implementation of the proposed approach turns out to be remarkably simple and computationally robust. For the evaluation of the displacements and damage gradients at nodes, the classical Z2 2 technique is used, and a new effective and computationally convenient iterative strategy is implemented to guarantee convergence of the staggered scheme. Four examples are presented in order to assess the suitability of the present model by using both AT1 and AT2 regularization models. Results show the desired effect of limiting crack propagation to prevailing tensile states, as well as of recovering the initial intact stiffness upon load reversal, even when two of the most common energy splits fail.
A phase-field gradient-based energy split for the modeling of brittle fracture under load reversal
Perego, U.
2024-01-01
Abstract
In the phase-field modeling of fracture, the search for a physically reasonable and computationally feasible criterion to split the elastic energy density into fractions that may or may not contribute to crack propagation has been the subject of many recent studies. Within this context, we propose an energy split - or energy decomposition - aimed at accurately representing the evolution of a crack under load reversal. To this purpose, two key assumptions are made. First, the damage gradient direction is interpreted as being representative of the normal-to- crack direction, as already assumed in previous works in the literature. The second assumption consists of considering the sign of the projection of the stress tensor onto the damage gradient direction at a point as an indicator of whether this point should behave as an opening or as a closing crack. We associate the latter case (crack closing) to both (a) a complete recovery of elastic energy density of the intact material (i.e., perfectly rough crack surfaces) and (b) a zero crack driving force at that point. The first case (crack opening) is treated classically as a damageable material point at which damage can increase. The implementation of the proposed approach turns out to be remarkably simple and computationally robust. For the evaluation of the displacements and damage gradients at nodes, the classical Z2 2 technique is used, and a new effective and computationally convenient iterative strategy is implemented to guarantee convergence of the staggered scheme. Four examples are presented in order to assess the suitability of the present model by using both AT1 and AT2 regularization models. Results show the desired effect of limiting crack propagation to prevailing tensile states, as well as of recovering the initial intact stiffness upon load reversal, even when two of the most common energy splits fail.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2024_Ferreira_Marengo_Perego_CMAME.pdf
Accesso riservato
Descrizione: Articolo pubblicato
:
Publisher’s version
Dimensione
6.65 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
6.65 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.