A breakthrough in the study of single-molecule magnets occurred with the discovery of zero-field slow magnetic relaxation and hysteresis for the linear iron(I) complex [Fe(C(SiMe 3 ) 3 ) 2 ] - (1), which has one of the largest spin-reversal barriers among mononuclear transition-metal single-molecule magnets. Theoretical studies have suggested that the magnetic anisotropy in 1 is made possible by pronounced stabilization of the iron dz 2 orbital due to 3dz 2 -4s mixing, an effect which is predicted to be less pronounced in the neutral iron(II) complex Fe(C(SiMe 3 ) 3 ) 2 (2). However, experimental support for this interpretation has remained lacking. Here, we use high-resolution single-crystal X-ray diffraction data to generate multipole models of the electron density in these two complexes, which clearly show that the iron dz 2 orbital is more populated in 1 than in 2. This result can be interpreted as arising from greater stabilization of the dz 2 orbital in 1, thus offering an unprecedented experimental rationale for the origin of magnetic anisotropy in 1.
Insights into Single-Molecule-Magnet Behavior from the Experimental Electron Density of Linear Two-Coordinate Iron Complexes
Genoni A.;
2019-01-01
Abstract
A breakthrough in the study of single-molecule magnets occurred with the discovery of zero-field slow magnetic relaxation and hysteresis for the linear iron(I) complex [Fe(C(SiMe 3 ) 3 ) 2 ] - (1), which has one of the largest spin-reversal barriers among mononuclear transition-metal single-molecule magnets. Theoretical studies have suggested that the magnetic anisotropy in 1 is made possible by pronounced stabilization of the iron dz 2 orbital due to 3dz 2 -4s mixing, an effect which is predicted to be less pronounced in the neutral iron(II) complex Fe(C(SiMe 3 ) 3 ) 2 (2). However, experimental support for this interpretation has remained lacking. Here, we use high-resolution single-crystal X-ray diffraction data to generate multipole models of the electron density in these two complexes, which clearly show that the iron dz 2 orbital is more populated in 1 than in 2. This result can be interpreted as arising from greater stabilization of the dz 2 orbital in 1, thus offering an unprecedented experimental rationale for the origin of magnetic anisotropy in 1.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Articolo30.pdf
Accesso riservato
:
Publisher’s version
Dimensione
1.61 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.61 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.