Architecture and regime: heritage of the Modern - An evident peculiarity of the twentieth century is the relationship between architecture and politics, in particular that dictated by the totalitarianisms that have pervaded numerous social and state structures. This connection developed between analogies and differences, originally proposing a continuity between past and future, through substantial contributions to the union between ideology and architectural aesthetics. The creative appropriation by these regimes also acted on the scale of the city, preparing both monumental compositions and less characterized realizations, up to using typically modern languages. This heritage poses considerable complexity in the attribution of the value judgment for the purposes of architectural recovery through which it is necessary to privilege the original meanings ‘case by case’.
Una peculiarità evidente del XX secolo è la relazione tra architettura e politica, in particolare quella dettata dai totalitarismi che hanno pervaso numerose strutture sociali e statuali. Questo rapporto si è snodato tra analogie e differenze, proponendo in origine una continuità tra passato e futuro, tramite contributi sostanziali al connubio tra ideologia ed estetica architettonica. L’appropriazione creativa da parte di questi regimi ha agito anche alla scala della città, predisponendo sia composizioni monumentali che realizzazioni meno caratterizzate, fino a utilizzare linguaggi prettamente moderni. Questa eredità pone rilevanti complessità nell’assegnazione del giudizio di valore ai fini del recupero architettonico per mezzo del quale occorre privilegiare ‘caso per caso’ i significati originari.
Architettura e regime: eredità del Moderno
Pierfranco Galliani
2022-01-01
Abstract
Architecture and regime: heritage of the Modern - An evident peculiarity of the twentieth century is the relationship between architecture and politics, in particular that dictated by the totalitarianisms that have pervaded numerous social and state structures. This connection developed between analogies and differences, originally proposing a continuity between past and future, through substantial contributions to the union between ideology and architectural aesthetics. The creative appropriation by these regimes also acted on the scale of the city, preparing both monumental compositions and less characterized realizations, up to using typically modern languages. This heritage poses considerable complexity in the attribution of the value judgment for the purposes of architectural recovery through which it is necessary to privilege the original meanings ‘case by case’.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Galliani_2022_Architettura e regime.pdf
Accesso riservato
:
Publisher’s version
Dimensione
4.24 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.24 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.