This work investigates the performance of a fluidized-bed membrane reactor for pure hydrogen production. A techno-economic assessment of a plant with the production capacity of 100 kgH2/day was carried out, evaluating the optimum design of the system in terms of reactor size (diameter and number of membranes) and operating pressures. Starting from a biomass source, hydrogen production through autothermal reforming of two different feedstock, biogas and biomethane, is compared. Results in terms of efficiency indicates that biomethane outperforms biogas as feedstock for the system, both from the reactor (97.4% vs 97.0%) and the overall system efficiency (63.7% vs 62.7%) point of views. Nevertheless, looking at the final LCOH, the additional cost of biomethane leads to a higher cost of the hydrogen produced (4.62 €/kgH2@20 bar vs 4.39 €/kgH2@20 bar), indicating that at the current price biogas is the more convenient choice.
Membrane reactors for green hydrogen production from biogas and biomethane: A techno-economic assessment
Ongis, Michele;Di Marcoberardino, Gioele;Manzolini, Giampaolo;Gallucci, Fausto;Binotti, Marco
2023-01-01
Abstract
This work investigates the performance of a fluidized-bed membrane reactor for pure hydrogen production. A techno-economic assessment of a plant with the production capacity of 100 kgH2/day was carried out, evaluating the optimum design of the system in terms of reactor size (diameter and number of membranes) and operating pressures. Starting from a biomass source, hydrogen production through autothermal reforming of two different feedstock, biogas and biomethane, is compared. Results in terms of efficiency indicates that biomethane outperforms biogas as feedstock for the system, both from the reactor (97.4% vs 97.0%) and the overall system efficiency (63.7% vs 62.7%) point of views. Nevertheless, looking at the final LCOH, the additional cost of biomethane leads to a higher cost of the hydrogen produced (4.62 €/kgH2@20 bar vs 4.39 €/kgH2@20 bar), indicating that at the current price biogas is the more convenient choice.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0360319923005700-main.pdf
accesso aperto
:
Publisher’s version
Dimensione
2.07 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.07 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.