The role of experts has been called into question recently. Scholarly works debate whether expert judgement is given excessive reliance on innovation, science, and entrepreneurial decision-making. Increasingly, there are arguments that managers, founders, and funders would be better off relying on randomisation to a much higher degree. This article sheds light on the integration of randomisation in decision-making, presenting the pros and cons of expert advice, on the one hand, and randomisation, on the other hand. The discussion goes beyond the Expert - Randomisation dichotomy and lays the foundation for thinking about decision-making in the modern era, and specifically the role of Artificial Intelligence. This Version: 5 November 2023

Randomisation as a tool for organisational decision-making: a debatable or debilitating proposition?

Franzoni, Chiara;
2023-01-01

Abstract

The role of experts has been called into question recently. Scholarly works debate whether expert judgement is given excessive reliance on innovation, science, and entrepreneurial decision-making. Increasingly, there are arguments that managers, founders, and funders would be better off relying on randomisation to a much higher degree. This article sheds light on the integration of randomisation in decision-making, presenting the pros and cons of expert advice, on the one hand, and randomisation, on the other hand. The discussion goes beyond the Expert - Randomisation dichotomy and lays the foundation for thinking about decision-making in the modern era, and specifically the role of Artificial Intelligence. This Version: 5 November 2023
2023
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Dushnitsky_eta_Randomization.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 1.68 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.68 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1257023
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact