Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) is a recent MRI-technique able to quantify the bulk magnetic susceptibility of myelin, iron, and calcium in the brain. Its variability across different acquisition parameters has prompted the need for standardisation across multiple centres and MRI vendors. However, a high level of agreement between repeated imaging acquisitions is equally important. With this study we aimed to assess the inter-scan repeatability of an optimised multi-echo GRE sequence in 28 healthy volunteers. We extracted and compared the susceptibility measures from the scan and rescan acquisitions across 7 bilateral brain regions (i.e., 14 regions of interest (ROIs)) relevant for neurodegeneration. Repeatability was first assessed while reconstructing QSM with a fixed number of echo times (i.e., 8). Excellent inter-scan repeatability was found for putamen, globus pallidus and caudate nucleus, while good performance characterised the remaining structures. An increased variability was instead noted for small ROIs like red nucleus and substantia nigra. Secondly, we assessed the impact exerted on repeatability by the number of echoes used to derive QSM maps. Results were impacted by this parameter, especially in smaller regions. Larger brain structures, on the other hand, showed more consistent performance. Nevertheless, with either 8 or 7 echoes we managed to obtain good inter-scan repeatability on almost all ROIs. These findings indicate that the designed acquisition/reconstruction protocol has wide applicability, particularly in clinical or research settings involving longitudinal acquisitions (e.g. rehabilitation studies).

Optimal echo times for quantitative susceptibility mapping: A test-retest study on basal ganglia and subcortical brain nuclei

Bordin, Valentina;Pirastru, Alice;Bergsland, Niels;Baselli, Giuseppe;
2023-01-01

Abstract

Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) is a recent MRI-technique able to quantify the bulk magnetic susceptibility of myelin, iron, and calcium in the brain. Its variability across different acquisition parameters has prompted the need for standardisation across multiple centres and MRI vendors. However, a high level of agreement between repeated imaging acquisitions is equally important. With this study we aimed to assess the inter-scan repeatability of an optimised multi-echo GRE sequence in 28 healthy volunteers. We extracted and compared the susceptibility measures from the scan and rescan acquisitions across 7 bilateral brain regions (i.e., 14 regions of interest (ROIs)) relevant for neurodegeneration. Repeatability was first assessed while reconstructing QSM with a fixed number of echo times (i.e., 8). Excellent inter-scan repeatability was found for putamen, globus pallidus and caudate nucleus, while good performance characterised the remaining structures. An increased variability was instead noted for small ROIs like red nucleus and substantia nigra. Secondly, we assessed the impact exerted on repeatability by the number of echoes used to derive QSM maps. Results were impacted by this parameter, especially in smaller regions. Larger brain structures, on the other hand, showed more consistent performance. Nevertheless, with either 8 or 7 echoes we managed to obtain good inter-scan repeatability on almost all ROIs. These findings indicate that the designed acquisition/reconstruction protocol has wide applicability, particularly in clinical or research settings involving longitudinal acquisitions (e.g. rehabilitation studies).
2023
Basal ganglia
Magnetic resonance imaging
Quantitative susceptibility mapping
Rehabilitation study
Repeatability
Subcortical brain nuclei
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bordin - QSM - NI 2023.pdf

accesso aperto

: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 1.71 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.71 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1249798
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact