Research has clearly shown that retrofitting existing buildings with energy-efficient measures, such as high-performance glazing, shading devices, and thermal insulation coatings can significantly reduce the environmental burden of the building sector. However, these mitigation strategies can also impact the quantity and quality of daylight received by the indoor environment, as well as the outdoor view, aspects that markedly affect luminous well-being and, for office buildings, productivity. The study quantifies the impact of most of these changes on daylighting performance and outdoor view by comparing the results against climate-based metrics and specific sky conditions. Additionally, from the perspective of user-centered design, it introduces a metric for outdoor view assessment and proposes an alternative approach to calculate minimum view potential (MVP*) which also examinates the influence that the indoor users’ disposition may have on access to outdoor views. By constructing a context-based residential building archetype and analyzing the effects of different insulation thicknesses and glazing replacement strategies, the study aims to identify optimal design solutions that balance thermal performance with visual comfort. Results suggest that the different retrofit strategies yield different impacts, more on the average daylight factor (39 ÷ 52%) and outdoor-view (10 ÷ 27%), rather than on the climate-based daylight metrics as Daylight Autonomy (DA) and Useful Daylight Illuminance (UDI).

Residential Energy Retrofits: Balancing Daylight Performance and Outdoor view

Andrea Giovanni Mainini;Matteo Cavaglià;Juan Diego Blanco Cadena;Alberto Speroni;Tiziana Poli;
2023-01-01

Abstract

Research has clearly shown that retrofitting existing buildings with energy-efficient measures, such as high-performance glazing, shading devices, and thermal insulation coatings can significantly reduce the environmental burden of the building sector. However, these mitigation strategies can also impact the quantity and quality of daylight received by the indoor environment, as well as the outdoor view, aspects that markedly affect luminous well-being and, for office buildings, productivity. The study quantifies the impact of most of these changes on daylighting performance and outdoor view by comparing the results against climate-based metrics and specific sky conditions. Additionally, from the perspective of user-centered design, it introduces a metric for outdoor view assessment and proposes an alternative approach to calculate minimum view potential (MVP*) which also examinates the influence that the indoor users’ disposition may have on access to outdoor views. By constructing a context-based residential building archetype and analyzing the effects of different insulation thicknesses and glazing replacement strategies, the study aims to identify optimal design solutions that balance thermal performance with visual comfort. Results suggest that the different retrofit strategies yield different impacts, more on the average daylight factor (39 ÷ 52%) and outdoor-view (10 ÷ 27%), rather than on the climate-based daylight metrics as Daylight Autonomy (DA) and Useful Daylight Illuminance (UDI).
2023
In Transition: challenges and opportunities for the built heritage - Book of Abstracts
979-12-81229-02-0
User-centred design, Building Retrofit, Daylighting, Outdoor view, Visual comfort
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
230205_Abstract_ArTec2023_PaperDaylight_VF_NoNames.pdf

Accesso riservato

: Pre-Print (o Pre-Refereeing)
Dimensione 94.95 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
94.95 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
RTDB_CONVEGNO_NAZIONALE_2023_Mainini_Retrofit_copertina.pdf

Accesso riservato

: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 4.28 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.28 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1248984
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact