Over the past decades, philosophy-of-science scholars have been questioning the epistemology of automated data analysis. Coming to the field of artif icial intelligence application in the design process, the debate has been less intense and articulate. The interest in developing a disciplinary discussion refers to the proactive quality of design, which aims at introducing artifacts into the physical world through the act of shaping, which includes a process of context interpretation. By acknowledging that the environment and its interpretation are inextricably bound to the design process, and by questioning the epistemology of automated analytics, we ask if artificial intelligence is not an aesthetic device producing outcomes that are a form of (meta-)art. Our hypothesis is that the models for automated data analysis do not satisfy the need for objectivity often expected through the application of parametric design because of their biases. However, as an aesthetic interpretation of a place, they inspire designers and stimulate their interpretation in the framework of the hermeneutic process of design, indicating an evolution toward a renewed “new-humanism,” a rediscovery of the creative agency of the designer in an un-hierarchical relationship with nature.

Artificial intelligence as (meta-)art? Emergent technologies in the design process

P. Sturla;M. Jakob
2021-01-01

Abstract

Over the past decades, philosophy-of-science scholars have been questioning the epistemology of automated data analysis. Coming to the field of artif icial intelligence application in the design process, the debate has been less intense and articulate. The interest in developing a disciplinary discussion refers to the proactive quality of design, which aims at introducing artifacts into the physical world through the act of shaping, which includes a process of context interpretation. By acknowledging that the environment and its interpretation are inextricably bound to the design process, and by questioning the epistemology of automated analytics, we ask if artificial intelligence is not an aesthetic device producing outcomes that are a form of (meta-)art. Our hypothesis is that the models for automated data analysis do not satisfy the need for objectivity often expected through the application of parametric design because of their biases. However, as an aesthetic interpretation of a place, they inspire designers and stimulate their interpretation in the framework of the hermeneutic process of design, indicating an evolution toward a renewed “new-humanism,” a rediscovery of the creative agency of the designer in an un-hierarchical relationship with nature.
2021
Artificial Intelligence, Data Analysis, (Meta-)Art, New Humanism
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Sturla_Jakob_Artificial intelligence as Meta Art_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 488.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
488.79 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1232594
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact