Comparing John Ruskin and Viollet le Duc to highlight their opposing approaches to protecting the past is frequent when reading about them and is indeed valid and effective. Here we take this approach, moving along with their travels in Italy which also have never been compared. Interpreting preservation as conservation and maintenance on one hand, or restoration and repair on the other are the opposing strategies upheld by these two authoritative figures in European cultural attitudes to restoration in the mid-19th century. Focusing on the 1830s, and their first visits to Italy – not yet studied in parallel – implies grasping how their experience of architecture, landscape, and Italian society influenced their later reflections on conservation. Here we examine the impact on their contemporaries and future generations of the concept of the ‘monument’ as a lasting object that can be repaired and perfected, or an animated one, reflecting its time and the nature of the places and local traditions. The aim is to highlight the impact on contemporary and future generations of a concept of the ‘monument’ as a lasting object that can be repaired and perfected, rather than a ‘live’ one, because it is marked by time, and conditioned by the nature of the places and local traditions.

Aventuras italianas 1835-1837. Los primeros viajes en Italia de Ruskin y Viollet-le-Duc.

Michela Marisa Grisoni
2022-01-01

Abstract

Comparing John Ruskin and Viollet le Duc to highlight their opposing approaches to protecting the past is frequent when reading about them and is indeed valid and effective. Here we take this approach, moving along with their travels in Italy which also have never been compared. Interpreting preservation as conservation and maintenance on one hand, or restoration and repair on the other are the opposing strategies upheld by these two authoritative figures in European cultural attitudes to restoration in the mid-19th century. Focusing on the 1830s, and their first visits to Italy – not yet studied in parallel – implies grasping how their experience of architecture, landscape, and Italian society influenced their later reflections on conservation. Here we examine the impact on their contemporaries and future generations of the concept of the ‘monument’ as a lasting object that can be repaired and perfected, or an animated one, reflecting its time and the nature of the places and local traditions. The aim is to highlight the impact on contemporary and future generations of a concept of the ‘monument’ as a lasting object that can be repaired and perfected, rather than a ‘live’ one, because it is marked by time, and conditioned by the nature of the places and local traditions.
2022
restoration vs preservation – modern vs vernacular architecture – Milan - Lake Como
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Loggia 35_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: articolo file pdf
: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 3.52 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.52 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1227093
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact